question regarding uni+

[hichrist]

In short: if a character can destroy a star-sized 4D realm, what tier is that?

VSBW states: "Common fictional examples of spaces representing such sizes are space-time continuums of a universal scale." - for low 2C.

For 1C, it says: "[...]the entirety of spaces whose size corresponds to one to two higher levels of infinity greater than a standard universal model (Low 2-C structures[...]".

By these definitions, you do not qualify for uni+ in my example, but you should be above high universal. The term I've seen used in such cases is "4D(/5D/etc. AP".

What tier would you be if you could erase a space-time continuum of a significantly smaller 3-dimensional size than a universe?

 

[Blahblah9755]

The first paragraph of the explanation section of the tiering system page pretty much answers this. If it’s finite 4D but there’s no explanation of how 4D stuff works in verse, it’s listed as unknown.

 

[hichrist]

Thanks a lot, sir.

 

[manu_zarri]

You said a 4D Star Sized realm?

High 3-A, or Unknown but the latter is low ball

 

[Blahblah9755]

Finite 4D structures aren’t High 3-A under the current tiering system. Without context they’re Unknown, and if there’s context of 4D structures being transcendent to 3D structures, they’re Low 2-C.

 

[manu_zarri]

Finite 4D structures aren’t High 3-A under the current tiering system. Without context they’re Unknown, and if there’s context of 4D structures being transcendent to 3D structures, they’re Low 2-C.

1 We are assuming it's actually 4D.
2 Low 2-C is destroying a space-time on universal size, in particular, Billions and Billions of years, that's why Diavolo and Giorno before was rated High 3-A instead of Low 2-C, because Diavolo errased on universal level but only 10 seconds.

 

[Planck69]

Affecting a very finite 4-dimensional structure is just Unknown, unless this is a spatially finite space-time continuum, which is a whole other can of worms. In this case, it'd probably be At least 4-C or something.

 

[manu_zarri]

unless this is a spatially finite space-time continuum, which is a whole other can of worms. In this case, it'd probably be At least 4-C or something.

"Spatial Finite", Low 2-C is spatial finite and even time can be finite, our Universe dosen't have Infinite time, it will stop at the big freeze. And it mostly should be High 3-A, since it's not universal size if it's a space-time

 

[Blahblah9755]

Diavolo and Giorno had that rating before the changes to the tiering system. In its current version, High 3-A relates only to infinite 3D structures.

 

[Planck69]

"Spatial Finite", Low 2-C is spatial finite and even time can be finite, our Universe dosen't have Infinite time, it will stop at the big freeze. And it mostly should be High 3-A, since it's not universal size if it's a space-time

I have little clue what this has to do with what I posted but it doesn't matter either way. And why are you saying that this is High 3-A?

 

[manu_zarri]

Diavolo and Giorno had that rating before the changes to the tiering system. In its current version, High 3-A relates only to infinite 3D structures.

they got downgraded for a whole other reason (that for Diavolo is kinda wrong), but i finded it's still like that until now in ger range thread

I have little clue what this has to do with what I posted but it doesn't matter either way. And why are you saying that this is High 3-A?

Reason above.

 

[Arceus0x]

so here's the deal
we have two universes right? Like actual 4-D space-time continuoms which existed for the appropriate amount of time
But one is 4-A in size and the other is, appropriatly 3-A or high 3-A
However the fact that it is a 4-D space time continuom makes the 3-A to high 3-A one low 2-C
but according to your logic the 4-A one will get unknown or at least 4-A...why? being 4-D is already>>>high 3-A as infinite 3D power does not nearly equate to 4-D.
this does not make sense and i want an explanation.
If it is again some "math on a thread we did a while ago" then give me the links. Similar threads had similar questions and i saw no links to threads or discussions or math.

 

[manu_zarri]

so here's the deal
we have two universes right? Like actual 4-D space-time continuoms which existed for the appropriate amount of time
But one is 4-A in size and the other is, appropriatly 3-A or high 3-A
However the fact that it is a 4-D space time continuom makes the 3-A to high 3-A one low 2-C
but according to your logic the 4-A one will get unknown or at least 4-A...why? being 4-D is already>>>high 3-A as infinite 3D power does not nearly equate to 4-D.
this does not make sense and i want an explanation.
If it is again some "math on a thread we did a while ago" then give me the links. Similar threads had similar questions and i saw no links to threads or discussions or math.

That's just above baseline Low 2-C. and Featless characthers with vague stataments such "Im 4D" gets unknown, that since 2019. High 3-A isn't necessary 3D, but can also be 4D power but not enough for Low 2-C. I already proved my point above. I know that it's probably not refered to me, but it dosen't matter.

 

[Arceus0x]

1. yes im not talking to you, forgot to quote.

2. i LITERALY said that we have two 4-D space times and then you hit me with the "Featless characthers with vague stataments such "Im 4D" gets unknown, that since 2019.". Please read, not skim through what i have to say.

also...
"High 3-A isn't necessary 3D"
wut

 

[manu_zarri]

2. i LITERALY said that we have two 4-D space times and then you hit me with the "Featless characthers with vague stataments such "Im 4D" gets unknown, that since 2019.". Please read, not skim through what i have to say.

also...
"High 3-A isn't necessary 3D"
wut

That was refering to "being 4-D is already>>>high 3-A as infinite 3D power does not nearly equate to 4-D." which is wrong, since 4D energy which isn't Low 2-C is still 4D but High 3-A.