• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Question about other dimensional spaces

Migue79

He/Him
VS Battles
Calculation Group
Messages
2,678
Reaction score
2,469
So I have this question:

I have noticed that for explicitly pocket dimensions, we cap its size according to whatever is inside of them (like if a pocket dimension contains a star it's 4-C or if it contains a galaxy it's 3-C or whatever).

But what about dimension/realities that are portrayed as not pocket ones but parallel ones (especially those that are parallel to the real world)? What would be the usual cap for them?
 
I believe it often boils down to how these parallel realities are depicted. It's a bit less about a strict "cap" and more about a default assumption based on context.

For parallel dimensions/realities that aren't explicitly pocket-sized and are presented as, say, alternatives to a main universe:
  • If they appear to be full-fledged, independent universes, the general starting assumption is often that they are 3-A in terms of spatial scale, similar to our own observable universe, unless specific details suggest they're smaller or, perhaps, infinitely vast (High 3-A).
  • If they're shown to be complete 4-D spacetime continuums (i.e., having their own independent timeline from beginning to end), then affecting or creating/destroying the entirety of one would typically be Low 2-C
The term "dimension" itself can be a bit tricky. If it's used synonymously with "realm" or "parallel world," the above usually applies. If it's referring to higher spatial dimensions in a mathematical sense, then you'd be looking at Tier 1 scaling (Low 1-C and up).

So, there isn't a universal "cap" as such – they could be part of a larger multiverse (Tier 2) or be even more complex. It really hinges on the specific evidence within the fiction regarding their size, structure, and nature. Without that, it's hard to be definitive.
 
Interesting. So there’s no upper limit to how large parallel realities can be. And the lowest they can be I imagine is the size of the dimension they’re parallel to…?
 
But what about dimension/realities that are portrayed as not pocket ones but parallel ones (especially those that are parallel to the real world)? What would be the usual cap for them?
Depend. If the parallel dimension is a parallel version of the main universe, you can reasonably assume it's around the same size as the original one. Obviously, getting some confirmation would be better.

Although, there is no real limit either, that alternate dimension could be way smaller, the same size, or bigger than the original universe, you just need to prove it.
 
we cap its size according to whatever is inside of them
Small correction, it isn't, you can have an empty universe yet it is still 3-A, so too pocket dimension can be empty and still can be tiered depend on its size
 
Back
Top