Question about high 3A

[Manas_ciel_sensei]

So let's take Rukia for example and it was stated that her bankai can reach absolute zero so wouldn't let's theoretically assume it requires infinite energy and she did reach absolute zero but does this qualify for high 3A requirements of demonstrating infinite energy on a 3D scale?(Not trying to scale Rukia btw just asking a genuine question)

 

[BeTheWay1rst]

No, you need a statement of the charecter needing infinite energy just like with Light speed.

 

[Manas_ciel_sensei]

No, you need a statement of the charecter needing infinite energy just like with Light speed.

But scientifically reaching absolute zero requires infinite energy so we don't really need direct infinite energy statement here unless you guys are just ignoring scientific facts.

 

[BeTheWay1rst]

But scientifically reaching absolute zero requires infinite energy so we don't really need direct infinite energy statement here unless you guys are just ignoring scientific facts.

It is not scientifically correct, it's only theorical in reality with no way of proving it. And you are talking about a fiction, without statement you can't just grant it.

 

[Manas_ciel_sensei]

It is not scientifically correct, it's only theorical in reality with no way of proving it. And you are talking about a fiction, without statement you can't just grant it.

Do Theory are 'No' without direct statements?

 

[Im_Fire444]

So let's take Rukia for example and it was stated that her bankai can reach absolute zero so wouldn't let's theoretically assume it requires infinite energy and she did reach absolute zero but does this qualify for high 3A requirements of demonstrating infinite energy on a 3D scale?(Not trying to scale Rukia btw just asking a genuine question)

"Reaching absolute zero" in fiction doesn't necessarily imply infinite energy unless the story explicitly states it follows real-world thermodynamics. Claiming Rukia reaches High 3-A because of "absolute zero" is an appeal to real-life physics. Real-world physics shouldn't be used in fiction unless the story confirms it.

(This isn't about absolute zero specifically, but about the contradiction of applying real-world physics.)

Many verses have faster-than-light characters, which clearly contradict real-world physic like Bleach, where FTL characters exist.

 

[BeTheWay1rst]

Do Theory are 'No' without direct statements?

Yes

 

[Frey_Starlight]

theory without direct statements to prove that said theory is being used in the story isnt all that useful. heck isnt that also why a lot of verses try to cope for string theory jargon and inhale hopium that 'of course the author of the story meant everything thats in this --theory in its entirity so the verse should scale to that without question'

 

[Voidnether]

So let's take Rukia for example and it was stated that her bankai can reach absolute zero so wouldn't let's theoretically assume it requires infinite energy and she did reach absolute zero but does this qualify for high 3A requirements of demonstrating infinite energy on a 3D scale?(Not trying to scale Rukia btw just asking a genuine question)

Doesn't absolute zero halts all matter instead of infinite energy?

 

[Manas_ciel_sensei]

Doesn't absolute zero halts all matter instead of infinite energy?

Yeah but theoretically reaching absolute zero would need infinite energy.