Qualitative Superiority

[HakutoRei000]

たとえば、二次元的存在が一つの映像の中で生きていると想像してほしい。彼らの視点からすれば、その世界のあらゆる可能な行動――時間を進めたり、逆行させたりすること――ができるが、依然として二次元という枠組みに縛られている。
では、その映像をスマートフォンで視聴している三次元的存在と比べてみよう。三次元の観測者は、映像を好きな場所へ移動させ、停止し、巻き戻し、さらには二次元の存在が永遠に知覚できない部分までも覗き見ることができる。
さらに一歩進んで、もし四次元的存在が存在するとすれば、三次元の世界そのものを一種の「映像」としてあらゆる角度から眺め、三次元の存在には想像もできない方法で操作し、その現実の根源的構成要素すら感知できるだろう。
そして、この関係は更なる高次元へと続く。次元が一つ上がるごとに、新たな知覚と支配の階層が開かれ、下位の次元において絶対的・最終的に見えるものですら、上位の次元においては全体のごく一部に過ぎないという事実が露わになるのである。

MTL:
Imagine, for example, that two-dimensional beings live in a single image. From their point of view, they can perform all possible actions in that world - move forward or backward in time - but they are still bound by the framework of two dimensions.
Now let's compare that image to a three-dimensional being viewing it on a smartphone. The three-dimensional observer can move, stop, rewind, and even peek into parts of the image that the two-dimensional being cannot perceive forever.
Going one step further, if a four-dimensional being exists, it would be able to view the three-dimensional world itself as a kind of “image” from all angles, manipulate it in ways unimaginable to a three-dimensional being, and even perceive the fundamental components of its reality.
And this relationship will continue on to higher dimensions. With each dimension, a new hierarchy of perception and control opens up, revealing the fact that what appears absolute and final in the lower dimension is only a small part of the whole in the higher dimension.

Translated with DeepL.com

is This 1-A?

 

[SweetDao]

Seems like the usual way spatial dimensions are explained, so no.

 

[HakutoRei000]

Seems like the usual way spatial dimensions are explained, so no.

Context for better explanation:

Spoiler

(What you understand is not necessarily what truly exists—it is merely one side of it. If you pull back your perception further and further, you will eventually reach a point of knowledge where you realize the ultimate truth of all that exists. And in the end, you will come to see that every hierarchy of consciousness—each appearing to be a state greater than the one below—is, in its entirety, nothing more than a dream, a mere lie, a video, a story, and an empty canvas.)[\SPOILER]

and the dimension part is just a "lower" forms of explanation for a "low" being for it not to cease the Character existence by the sheer existence of a truth of hierarchy.

 

[HakutoRei000]

bump

 

[Vietthai96]

Just higher and higher dimensions, literally, qualitative superiority require the one from higher plane see the lower plane as completely unreal, nonexistent, or in math, see lower being as literal 0D.

2d beings, 3d beings, etc..., while seem insignificant to higher d beings, they are still physically existing

 

[Astral_Trinity439]

MTL:
Imagine, for example, that two-dimensional beings live in a single image. From their point of view, they can perform all possible actions in that world - move forward or backward in time - but they are still bound by the framework of two dimensions.
Now let's compare that image to a three-dimensional being viewing it on a smartphone. The three-dimensional observer can move, stop, rewind, and even peek into parts of the image that the two-dimensional being cannot perceive forever.
Going one step further, if a four-dimensional being exists, it would be able to view the three-dimensional world itself as a kind of “image” from all angles, manipulate it in ways unimaginable to a three-dimensional being, and even perceive the fundamental components of its reality.
And this relationship will continue on to higher dimensions. With each dimension, a new hierarchy of perception and control opens up, revealing the fact that what appears absolute and final in the lower dimension is only a small part of the whole in the higher dimension.

Translated with DeepL.com

is This 1-A?

No, since per the last part, the lower dimensions are a "small part" of the higher dimension, which isn't the case for qualitative superiority.

Plus it seems the term "image" is used for analogy of perception rather than for r>f here.

Context for better explanation:

Spoiler

(What you understand is not necessarily what truly exists—it is merely one side of it. If you pull back your perception further and further, you will eventually reach a point of knowledge where you realize the ultimate truth of all that exists. And in the end, you will come to see that every hierarchy of consciousness—each appearing to be a state greater than the one below—is, in its entirety, nothing more than a dream, a mere lie, a video, a story, and an empty canvas.)[\SPOILER]

and the dimension part is just a "lower" forms of explanation for a "low" being for it not to cease the Character existence by the sheer existence of a truth of hierarchy.

I'm not sure from this, actually. Despite how clear this part is, the previous part has what seems to be an anti feat.

Though you could get 1-A by proving that the "small part" refers to not the fiction itself but what represents fiction. Like a mangabook or the like.