- 751
- 398
- Thread starter
- #81
Yes. Musclemass also empowers devastators as well, though they don't have an exact AP value.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Prototype 1 AP/Lifting Strength Revision
- Thread starter RisingIons
- Start date
-
- Tags
- alex mercer prototype
- 2,391
- 317
Done.
Edit: Also did the rest of the edits to other stats as clean up.
Edit: Also did the rest of the edits to other stats as clean up.
Last edited:
- 15,708
- 7,680
It seems fine.
- 751
- 398
- Thread starter
- #84
Good lord that is a wall of text.
- 2,391
- 317
Already applied the changes in his absence.
- 2,391
- 317
If it helps, I can shorten it by only including the clarification rounded brackets (or parentheses) to only the two keys instead, where it's only the first two?
(First one to showcase what it should do once the readers first read it, the second one to showcase where the Low 7-C with Musclemass multiplier comes from)
- 751
- 398
- Thread starter
- #87
Tips:
-You don't always have to name all of his powers. Just say 8-A with powers, Low 7-C with musclemass, likely higher (or whatever), his powers section at the bottom of the page lists all of his offensive powers
-You don't have to say "can likely" for things we know he can do
-Don't have to define devastators in the AP section, that's what the power section is for, it's already defined there
-Don't have to explain the same reasoning for a power increase in every key after the first time (you explain how musclemass works in every key, anything after the first batch of reasonings is redundant)
-You can always use more condensed wording (ex. "was able to dodge lightning" can simply be "dodged lightning" with a link to the feat)
-" even higher with Musclemass multiplier, even more higher with Devastators" This ain't it.
-You don't always have to name all of his powers. Just say 8-A with powers, Low 7-C with musclemass, likely higher (or whatever), his powers section at the bottom of the page lists all of his offensive powers
-You don't have to say "can likely" for things we know he can do
-Don't have to define devastators in the AP section, that's what the power section is for, it's already defined there
-Don't have to explain the same reasoning for a power increase in every key after the first time (you explain how musclemass works in every key, anything after the first batch of reasonings is redundant)
-You can always use more condensed wording (ex. "was able to dodge lightning" can simply be "dodged lightning" with a link to the feat)
-" even higher with Musclemass multiplier, even more higher with Devastators" This ain't it.
Last edited:
- 2,391
- 317
Alright. Devastators are hardly defined in Powers section, so I've had it defined in the AP section for now and removed the redundant justifications after the first AP section and removed the "likely" for "can likely". I can leave the rest to someone else for the grammatical formatting.
Edit: Did the final edit by removing the "even more higher" bit.
I think this thread is concluded now.
Edit: Did the final edit by removing the "even more higher" bit.
I think this thread is concluded now.
Last edited:
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
