• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Also this, but I feel like the calc should be preserved for posterity. Subnautica fans might find that useful. Alternatively, ask the Subnautica Wiki if they'd be willing to preserve it.

VS Battles isn't a closed circuit, other sites do use our images / calcs as well. When you Google a character, most of the time, their render from VS Battles is going to be one of the first ones to come up. Food for thought.
 
Yep, the Gargantuan Leviathan is a decent enough profile supported by in-lore feats, and is an interactable element. If we were to delete it, that would imply all lore-only characters would be at risk of deletion.
 
Cropfist said:
That one actually seems to have developed lore and history.
But we still know nothing about its biology and powers. We don't know what it looked like in life, how it fought, what powers it used, etc. It could have breathed fire, used electricity, camoflauge, used sonar, or anything and we'd have no way of knowing it. We only have its skeleton to go by and nothing more, hence I feel its profile should be deleted.
 
If this is staying, then Minecraft fossils are coming, and there'll be nothing anyone can do to stop them.

Also, they really aren't. We know a surprising amount about how dinosaurs lived just based off of analyzing their bones and other preserved tissues. On the contrary, we don't know anything about the Leviathan because it's not real.
 
Nemo212 said:
If this is staying, then Minecraft fossils are coming, and there'll be nothing anyone can do to stop them.
Also, they really aren't. We know a surprising amount about how dinosaurs lived just based off of analyzing their bones and other preserved tissues. On the contrary, we don't know anything about the Leviathan because it's not real.
This, basically.
 
Also, this doesn't kill the rest of the lore pages on the wiki. As long as they have stated powers, abilities, and feats, they should be fine, which should be the case for pretty much all of them.
 
I don't know enough about 2hu to judge. I'm gonna stop discussing for now until someone with a colorful name steps in again.
 
Nemo212 said:
Also, this doesn't kill the rest of the lore pages on the wiki. As long as they have stated powers, abilities, and feats, they should be fine, which should be the case for pretty much all of them.
I agree. If a page got actual lore or history on the justification of the statistics, that should be fine; if a page does not do it; the page is basically a hypothetical profile and should not be allowed.
 
I agree that profiles for non-characters, that are not featured in any story, should preferably be removed.
 
The verse for Aika Sumeragi, Agent AIKa, is a hentai series with heavily explicit scenes (like, **** levels, not PG-13 levels) and basically fits the trope of sex-focused media

As such, it should be deleted for violating the "Franchises solely focused on sex" rule in the Editing Rules

I can elaborate the details of the ****-nature of the show, but I'll avoid so in order to not be crass.
 
We recently finally did edit them. I will delete the profile.
 
That's the first time I hear it called that tbh, I guess fanservice is considered **** now? It's not even a hentai series, and there are already actual hentai series on here with hardcore stuff that are on here.

Anyway you can provide all the panty shots or some ryona crap all you like, but I'd probably say it's "copious amount of distastefulness/degeneracy" then again does that make it outright ****? Might as well delete HSDxD and Freezing too.
 
The first episode literally has the character stripping scene for the Aika character, and the "pantyshots" are so explicit they may as well be wearing liquid latex for the amount of details it shows, as I for one couldn't tell the difference.

Not to mention Zero have the main villains who just tentacle rape every character they get.

Fairy Tail is fanservice, AIKa is **** made to bypass censors by questionable means.
 
ZackMoon1234 said:
Can Profiles from this Series be made - https://********.org/title/42554/when-a-martial-plays
Looks like it's seriously pushing the boundaries on what's considered notable.
 
According to our current Editing Rules we should probably remove Hunniepop.

Fandom has also turned stricter in removing hentai wikis due to branding itself as family-friendly.
 
Most of that stuff in Zero happens off screen anyway. I suppose ecchi/fanservice is now "****" while giving green Light to MGQ and Berserk and Demonbane which has real ****. Again if you wanna play s j w might aswell do away with HSDxD and Freezing which has similar stuff and they should go as well. In fact HSDxD actually shows tiddies while AA never
 
Here are our current Editing Rules:

"Preferably avoid adding character profiles that may be inappropriate or perceived to be in poor taste. This may include characters, weapons, etcetera, that are ill-suited for a statistics-indexing wiki, due to having no reliable feats, or ones from media which may be too controversial or otherwise unnecessary to be featured. This includes pages that would strictly be written as a joke, and as such more suitably belong in the Joke Battles wiki. Although we do feature some franchises with mature content, those that are primarily focused on, or are only composed of, excessive levels of sexual content will not be featured here, and the pages have to be kept clean, without erotic images."

We reached these conclusions after very long discussions, so we cannot just overturn or ignore them.

As you can see, we should only disallow content wherein the main focus is sexual content, not wherein it is just a small part of the main story. That is all.
 
I'll respond fully later, just wanted to say, if I wanted to "go S J W", I'd discuss the ****** up under 18 agenda the show has on face value and implications and start reporting the profile to FANDOM itself, discrediting the wiki. Don't toss around labels without knowing the full context
 
Let's all calm down here please. I am not fond of intersectionalist identity politics and totalitarian censorship in society at large either, but this is just about maintaining some reasonable standards for a small entertainment wiki.
 
Okay, so to elaborate.

First off, in case you wanted to purposely commit an appeal to motive, my opinions stand against the age rating thing, as I personally wanted to add alotta Fenoxo stuff to the wiki. So I hate the rule as much as the next guy, this isn't a feminist agenda or something

Secondly, AIKa is a verse based on getting as many crotch shots with highly suggestive poses to the character. Literally everyone admits it has a next to non-existent plot solely to focus more on pornhub level softcore.

Thirdly, what are you talking about? AIKa does feature explicit nudity. AIKa's clothes get ripped apart during her transformation sequences and you'd actually see explicit details. And many of the so called pantyshots wrapped around said characters "equipment", so you're basically able to see everything. About the same as any mosaic censored yuri hentai. Also, "happening off-screen" here is they just not show you the actual penetration, rest is fair game in it. If any verse puts that much attention to this level of "fanservice", they deserved to be deleted.

Fourthly, the Beserk argument doesn't make sense as Berserk isn't focused on sex entirely.

Fifthly, we just had a Post Your Waifu thread hakai'd by FANDOM staff. They're clearly being very vigilant over sexual content, and the AIKa page had art in it that'll make a hooker blush.

Legitimately, if the AIKa page gets by then the Fenoxo games are justified. Every single episode of it is age restricted on YouTube, and are present on **** sites to hundred thousands of views
 
We should obviously follow our regulations and not allow the Aika page then.

Let's shift the focus to if we should delete Hunniepop and similar pages as well please.
 
Yes, agreed. Never mind what I said earlier. This thread already has over 400 posts, and we shouldn't have this kind of discussion here. It is probably better to start a separate thread in the staff forum regarding what hentai pages that we should remove.
 
Continued here: https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/3673649
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top