• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Possible small planet upgrade Bleach high tier black calc

Messages
966
Reaction score
466
INTRODUCTION

In Sawfy, the picaro encloses a space and creates a black hole in it. I will be calculating the energy required to create this black hole.

CALCULATION

I will be taking the average height of the piccaro, it is stated in the story that some of the piccaro are shorter while others were taller so i will be taking the average of height of the picaro being equal to the height of yachiru since they are implied to be relative size in the story and the official wiki height of yachiru 3ft.7 inch = 1.09m


Average picaro height = 1.09m

Since the number of picaro present at the feat was close to hundred at the time of the feat and I will be using hundred as default (circumference lowball) and assume that no spacing existed within them which is consistent about the picaro enclosing the space around allowing no energy to escape.

Circumference of picaro enclosure = 100 × 0.273m= 27.3m

Diameter and radius of the circle

Radius= 27.3/2π = 4.35m
Diameter= 2r= 8.70m


Assuming that the picaro would individually from their enclosed position (circumference) is looking a VISIBLE black sphere at 4.35m away at the radius from their position thus;

Visual angular resolution for a normally sighted human (20/20 vision) is about 1 arcminute (1′) ≈ π/10,800 ≈ 0.000290888 rad.

Linear size s subtending that angle at distance ddd is roughly

s= d × (tan(θ)) = d × (θ) for very small (θ)

Use d=4.35m

Results (smallest resolvable linear size at 4.35 m)

20/20 vision (1′):
θ=1′ → s = 4.35×0.000290888=0.001265 m = 1.27mm

Since the picaro are in the sky at the time of the feat thus they should have good lightning to see considerably at the distance to aleast that of a normal human acuity resolution.

The diameter of the black hole from the perspective they were all at Since it was atleast visible is =
1.27mm

Radius of black hole = 0.00127/2 = 0.000635 m

"Also to point out, any black hole within up to Low 4-C should be calculated with this formula: ((299792458^2/(2*6.674*10^-11))/(5.972*10^24))*(2.487*10^32) * radius in meters = energy in joules"

Using vswiki standards:
299792458^2/ (2*6.674*10^-11)/(5.972*10^24))&(2.487*10^32)* 0.000635 =

1.78055305721505*10^31 joules = 4.257 Zetta tons [Small Planet Level]


Please I need your thoughts on this for any correction
 
Last edited:
Should've put this in a blog on the fandom wiki lol
Anyways, the scans needed specifically are as follows:
Scans for Picaro heights
Scans for the amount of Picaro
Scans for where the Picaro were (your sky claim)
Maybe some more scans on the whole Black Hole thing
Anything extra that would help
 
You should post scans so people can get an idea of what the heck you are talking about
I didn't consider bringing scans because I didn't see the reason to, I am not asking about the validity of my calculation if you get what I mean. I am asking if the math itself and method of calc is correct.
 
Should've put this in a blog on the fandom wiki lol
Anyways, the scans needed specifically are as follows:
Scans for Picaro heights
Scans for the amount of Picaro
Scans for where the Picaro were (your sky claim)
Maybe some more scans on the whole Black Hole thing
Anything extra that would help

My aim was to create a CRT and address that and then attach the calc to it, the aim of this post is to know the method of calc and math it self is correct I will provide the scans in the CRT.
 
My aim was to create a CRT and address that and then attach the calc to it, the aim of this post is to know the method of calc and math it self is correct I will provided this scans in the CRT.
I see. I don't know if that's how this is supposed to be done, but if the CGM or other calc guys are fine with it, then go ahead /shrug
 
I see. I don't know if that's how this is supposed to be done, but if the CGM or other calc guys are fine with it, then go ahead /shrug
If there is need to bring scans I will I just want to know if the calc with these values is correct and it's the right way to calc it.
 
CRT def cant pass without an approved calc, it would be best to make a blog with all scans and citations added in along with the calc and then reposted here for evaluation, once a single CGM greenlights it you can take the calc to a CRT and have it applied to profiles (you can request KLOL to tag staff here)


They don't allow forum calculations (basically what you just posted) to be linked in the profiles
 
CRT def cant pass without an approved calc, it would be best to make a blog with all scans and citations added in along with the calc and then reposted here for evaluation, once a single CGM greenlights it you can take the calc to a CRT and have it applied to profiles (you can request KLOL to tag staff here)


They don't allow forum calculations (basically what you just posted) to be linked in the profiles
Alright thanks.
 
CRT def cant pass without an approved calc, it would be best to make a blog with all scans and citations added in along with the calc and then reposted here for evaluation, once a single CGM greenlights it you can take the calc to a CRT and have it applied to profiles (you can request KLOL to tag staff here)


They don't allow forum calculations (basically what you just posted) to be linked in the profiles
I just created another and followed your instructions. Please check this out.
 
I just created another and followed your instructions. Please check this out.
Formatting seems fine, all that's left is to get a CGM to evaluate it and give their greenlight, then you can take it to crts


You just need 1 vote to consider a calc accepted (the 3 staff vote rule only applies to crts)
try politely knocking on their message walls asking them to look at it and from on there you'll know what to do
 
Formatting seems fine, all that's left is to get a CGM to evaluate it and give their greenlight, then you can take it to crts


You just need 1 vote to consider a calc accepted (the 3 staff vote rule only applies to crts)
try politely knocking on their message walls asking them to look at it and from on there you'll know what to do
Thanks for your help
 
Make this calculation in a blog, with the necessary scans. Then you need one or two calc group members to accept it. It's just 1 for most verses, but highly popular or controversial ones, which Bleach certainly qualifies as, can benefit from 2.
 
Last edited:
Make this calculation in a blog, with the necessary scans. Then you need two calc group members to accept it. It's just 1 for most verses, but highly popular or controversial ones, which Bleach certainly qualifies as, need 2.
OP made a second thread, this one can be considered defunct
 
Make this calculation in a blog, with the necessary scans. Then you need two calc group members to accept it. It's just 1 for most verses, but highly popular or controversial ones, which Bleach certainly qualifies as, need 2.
I just created another and followed your instructions. Please check this out.
I did this already with the necessary scans. Please can you check that out?
 
Back
Top