• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Possible small planet bleach upgrade 2 again

Messages
966
Reaction score
466
After corrections made on my last post, I made another calc in the Fandom blog this time, The blog calculates the energy required for resurrecion Picarro creating a black hole in the World of the living utilizing the smallest possible interpretation from the factors available regarding that feat. Please I want this to be checked by anyone available and receive feed back as soon as possible.
 
The blog needs scans, and given that it's a Bleach calculation it'll require 2 Calc Group members to approve it.

You'll also be asked for proof that it's a black hole, and should estimate low when making theoretical size comparisons like the ones in the blog.
 
The blog needs scans, and given that it's a Bleach calculation it'll require 2 Calc Group members to approve it.
Are the scans in the blog not enough? What else do I need to provide scans for? Please if there is I would like to hear your input.
You'll also be asked for proof that it's a black hole, and should estimate low when making theoretical size comparisons like the ones in the blog.
I plan to do so in a CRT after the calc has been accepted and I used the lowest assumption and made a lot of lowballs in the calc.
 
Are the scans in the blog not enough? What else do I need to provide scans for? Please if there is I would like to hear your input.
Just a scan of the feat and the size of the character. Then we'd need a decent estimate of the black hole's size.
I plan to do so in CRT after the calc has been excepted and I used the lowest assumption and made a lot of lowballs in the calc.
It is likely to be questioned in the blog itself, given black hole feats are such a huge deal. It's probably best to include at least a basic explanation for why it's a black hole in the blog itself.
 
Just a scan of the feat and the size of the character. Then we'd need a decent estimate of the black hole's size.
It's a novel, I linked the feat in the novel on the blog at the introduction section. The first link shows the feat that happened in the novel.

I also I estimated the smallest possible size of the black hole by using the smallest size of it they can see at a distance from the circumference to the center of their enclosure (basically the radius length) to get a decent estimate at the black hole size.
It is likely to be questioned in the blog itself, given black hole feats are such a huge deal. It's probably best to include at least a basic explanation for why it's a black hole in the blog itself.
Or do I just upload the CRT and link it to the blog? So whoever sees it can access the CRT?
 
The scans I still think you need are about the Picaro's height. You have Yachiru's height and you're using a standard reference for Baby Nel's height, but you don't actually have a scan for the Picaro ranging in height and a scan that compares their height to Baby Nel.
 
The scans I still think you need are about the Picaro's height. You have Yachiru's height and you're using a standard reference for Baby Nel's height, but you don't actually have a scan for the Picaro ranging in height and a scan that compares their height to Baby Nel.
Oh I addressed that in my new calc in the blog check it out.
 
Should just send it in the bleach thread, message Arc7kuroi maybe?
 
Oh I addressed that in my new calc in the blog check it out.
"I will be taking the average height of the piccaro, it is stated in the story that some of the piccaro are shorter while others were taller than nellilel ( who looks like a 3 to 5 year old girl) however there is no official source of her height but the average height of 3 to 5 years olds roughly ranges from 3ft (0.9m) to 3ft 7in (1.09m) which is consistent with yachiru who should be a little taller than nelleil with an official height of 3ft 7in. With reasonable estimate nelleil should be at least 3ft (0.9m) tall which will be used as the default average height of the picaro.

Average picaro height = 0.9m

Average picaro width = 0.229 m"

This is the entire section in your new calc that I have looked over and it's not there. Unless you have a third calc, you don't have the scans I'm talking about. I've even opened all scans



Haven't found a scan for the Picaro ranging in height and a scan that compares their height to Baby Nel.
 
Particularly popular or controversial verses need more verification.
This rule is only applies to CRTs not calcs or calc threads and even for that the requirement is 3 not sure where you got 2

We’ve had countless Big 3 Calcs accepted with 1 vote before so that’s a non issue
 
This rule is only applies to CRTs not calcs or calc threads and even for that the requirement is 3 not sure where you got 2

We’ve had countless Big 3 Calcs accepted with 1 vote before so that’s a non issue
In my experience controversial verses need two Calc Group members for calculations.
 
"I will be taking the average height of the piccaro, it is stated in the story that some of the piccaro are shorter while others were taller than nellilel ( who looks like a 3 to 5 year old girl) however there is no official source of her height but the average height of 3 to 5 years olds roughly ranges from 3ft (0.9m) to 3ft 7in (1.09m) which is consistent with yachiru who should be a little taller than nelleil with an official height of 3ft 7in. With reasonable estimate nelleil should be at least 3ft (0.9m) tall which will be used as the default average height of the picaro.

Average picaro height = 0.9m

Average picaro width = 0.229 m"

This is the entire section in your new calc that I have looked over and it's not there. Unless you have a third calc, you don't have the scans I'm talking about. I've even opened all scans



Haven't found a scan for the Picaro ranging in height and a scan that compares their height to Baby Nel.

Alright thanks for that, I made the corrections here https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:Specterxxxx/Picaro's_black_hole
 
In my experience controversial verses need two Calc Group members for calculations.
2 is ideal
And also obligatory if you wanna change a clac

But just adding sth new only needs one, we’ve added big 3 calcs with one vote without any issue whatsoever and there isn’t any written rule on the 2 vote requirement either,
can’t have new members get confused on the rules dawg, already hard enough as it is getting even 1 vote
 
Last edited:
2 is ideal
And also obligatory if you wanna change a clac

But just adding sth new only needs one, we’ve added big 3 calcs with one vote without any issue whatsoever and there isn’t any written rule on the 2 vote requirement either,
can’t have new members get confused on the rules dawg, already hard enough as it is getting even 1 vote
It's true that the two votes rule isn't written in the pages except where it says to get 1-2 approvals. It does seem to be applied on a case by case basis though.

Okay, with the Calc Group being so busy it does make sense to reduce their workload and demand.
 
Back
Top