How does the monitors being inter-dimensional support that Superman’s pan-dimensional statement, is likely referring to just universes? An inter-dimensional entity is just a being that can time-travel and move out of the physical body into the spiritual one.
The word "inter-dimensional" simply means "between dimensions." Nothing about that word implies time-travel or the ability to between a physical and spiritual body. You are clearly just copying the first line of the wikipedia page titled
Interdimensional Being, however, the fact that someone wrote it on an obscure wikipedia page doesn't make it true. Looking into the history of the page, that line was added in July 2021 by an unregistered user, and sourced to a book by a fringe theory author titled "The Ancient Alien Question."
Earlier versions of the page give these definitions:
An
interdimensional being is a type of
fictional entity that is able to travel between dimensions using
interdimensional doorways
An
interdimensional being is a hypothetical type of entity in a
dimension beyond our own
Obviously, these are just random phrases made by anonymous people on wikipedia on a purely fictional concept, which is why it doesn't have much oversight. The word itself just means "between dimensions" and even earlier versions of the wiki page directly link to "parallel universes in fiction" as seen by the "interdimensional doorways" link.
The word "interdimensional" is used in lots of ways. For instance:
en.wikipedia.org
Interdimensional Doorway redirects to "parallel universes in fiction."
Interdimensional Travel redirects to "Multiverse"
Interdimensional Hypothesis is about a theory that UFOs are from other dimensions.
Interdimensional Being as discussed above.
So, no, we can't use this single phrase from an obscure wikipedia page to claim that interdimensional being means "being that can time-travel and move out of the physical body into the spiritual one." As demonstrated, the word has a variety of meanings, and given the context of the Monitors, the location of the HoH, and the other text in the scan, I think it is best interpreted as referring to universes, but either way it's just an interpretation.
In relation to the topic of tiering the Orrery, the word pan-dimensional is not by itself here. As not only in this context is it being utilized to describe a specific structure, but it’s describing a structure within a fully detailed cosmology.
Sure, but with absolutely no details given about it's meaning.
I definitely think the statement can be used for some type of tiering.
Without very clear evidence on what the meaning of "dimension" is in this context, and additional evidence being given about the nature of the structure and the aforementioned dimensions, no it can't. Who said that pan-dimensional supported High 1-B? Do you have any links or screenshots?
