- 5,655
- 1,142
I've had this problem for awhile now. Why does this site SOLELY focus on feats and completely disregard any form of benefit of the doubt?
I ask this in relation to Dragon Ball Specifically. It's like you require blatant statements of a thing in question before you even begi to think it's correct and even if it is performed on-screen, it's questioned to hell and back to the point that a lot of the time, it's flat out disregarded.
An example of this would be Manga Zamasu not having Combat-Applicable Mid-Godly Regen from surviving a Hakai. Why? In literally any other verse, this would've flew by with absolutely no problems but the moment Dragon Ball gets decent hax, we have to question it this much? Hit gets time stop hax, it's less potent than other Time stops. Goku and Beerus ending the universe in 3 punches? We need a timeframe and the form of how they do it; doing it by shockwaves is at most 3-B! (Ignoring that Goku used a Kamehameha that would've ended the universe after that 3 punches).
There's also stuff like Whis being unable to self-resurrect because he's never shown it. He literally points his staff at the thing he wants alive and they're alive. Why would his staff differentiate between other person and himself? It's literally point and revive!
In many of these cases, a lot of people (Particularly staff who wants "The most accurate information") completely disregards all of this because it's not 100% solid. The problem I have with this is the fact that if we take everything they said at face value, that Hakai would keep Zamasu down for any extended periods of time or that Whis can't self-revive would mean that the characters in the story are functionally brain-dead. Like say if Zamasu took longer than an hour to regenerate from a Hakai. That's MASSIVE for someone like Goku who needs very little time to regain more stamina than what he'd lose. Or say Whis dies due to some unforeseen circumstances. He can't revive himself, so if he died to an even stronger being, everyone's boned! The one being (Whis) that could possibly stand a chance is now dead! The GoD is left unattended and could do god knows how much damage!
tl;dr I am seriously questioning why everyone on this site is so damned fixated on "It has to be PERFECTLY SEEN ON-SCREEN for it to count! No grey zone ever!" which is completely at odds with how Dragon Ball works, who uses statements more than most verses. We disregard their statements and we have a broken universe with logical problems at every turn and corner.
I ask this in relation to Dragon Ball Specifically. It's like you require blatant statements of a thing in question before you even begi to think it's correct and even if it is performed on-screen, it's questioned to hell and back to the point that a lot of the time, it's flat out disregarded.
An example of this would be Manga Zamasu not having Combat-Applicable Mid-Godly Regen from surviving a Hakai. Why? In literally any other verse, this would've flew by with absolutely no problems but the moment Dragon Ball gets decent hax, we have to question it this much? Hit gets time stop hax, it's less potent than other Time stops. Goku and Beerus ending the universe in 3 punches? We need a timeframe and the form of how they do it; doing it by shockwaves is at most 3-B! (Ignoring that Goku used a Kamehameha that would've ended the universe after that 3 punches).
There's also stuff like Whis being unable to self-resurrect because he's never shown it. He literally points his staff at the thing he wants alive and they're alive. Why would his staff differentiate between other person and himself? It's literally point and revive!
In many of these cases, a lot of people (Particularly staff who wants "The most accurate information") completely disregards all of this because it's not 100% solid. The problem I have with this is the fact that if we take everything they said at face value, that Hakai would keep Zamasu down for any extended periods of time or that Whis can't self-revive would mean that the characters in the story are functionally brain-dead. Like say if Zamasu took longer than an hour to regenerate from a Hakai. That's MASSIVE for someone like Goku who needs very little time to regain more stamina than what he'd lose. Or say Whis dies due to some unforeseen circumstances. He can't revive himself, so if he died to an even stronger being, everyone's boned! The one being (Whis) that could possibly stand a chance is now dead! The GoD is left unattended and could do god knows how much damage!
tl;dr I am seriously questioning why everyone on this site is so damned fixated on "It has to be PERFECTLY SEEN ON-SCREEN for it to count! No grey zone ever!" which is completely at odds with how Dragon Ball works, who uses statements more than most verses. We disregard their statements and we have a broken universe with logical problems at every turn and corner.
