IdiosyncraticLawyer
Username OnlyVS Battles
Joke Battles
Administrator
Content Moderator
Translation Helper
- 2,819
- 3,261
Bump.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Off-Site Respect Threads on Wiki Pages (Staff Only)
- Thread starter Bobsican
- Start date
-
- Tags
- editing rules
- Status
- 164,926
- 71,611
- 164,926
- 71,611
- 1,808
- 2,809
What needs to be done here exactly?
- 164,926
- 71,611
Well, apparently this:
vsbattles.com
However, I am uncertain about the specifics.
@Bobsican
Off-Site Respect Threads on Wiki Pages (Staff Only)
I don't see why it defeats your idea. What I wrote above is to avoid adding 10 times a character performing the same feat and instead group it in the same sentence with a collection of images, yours is about the effectiveness and details of an ability. Both things seem completely different to me.
However, I am uncertain about the specifics.
@Bobsican
- 1,808
- 2,809
I checked the Standard Format page, and we have a text that is a bit similar to this, so I assume this will be the text that will be replaced?
Also, if I am allowed to, I can link to the specific text in the Editing Rules page via a different process so it doesn't get detected by our LinkSearch or DPL (basically, not the full link "vsbattles.fandom.com") because there are moderators that are currently looking for full vsbattles link to clean up. It looks something like this:
Also, if I am allowed to, I can link to the specific text in the Editing Rules page via a different process so it doesn't get detected by our LinkSearch or DPL (basically, not the full link "vsbattles.fandom.com") because there are moderators that are currently looking for full vsbattles link to clean up. It looks something like this:
Last edited:
- 164,926
- 71,611
Thank you for the information. The current text seems fine to keep in that case.
I do not understand why such an awkward linking method would be necessary.
- 1,808
- 2,809
Okay, so nothing will be changed then?Thank you for the information. The current text seems fine to keep in that case.
I was concerned that links would get detected as full vsbattles link, but nevermind that.
- 164,926
- 71,611
I think so, yes, unless Agnaa and Bobsican have objections.
Okay. I still do not understand though, but we should preferably use shortlinks within our wiki when it is possible.
- 1,808
- 2,809
I am referring to FANDOM links that use the feature in web browsers to link to specific parts of a page based on certain words, like in this one:
When you click on that hyperlink, it leads you to a text.
That hyperlink would look like this in the editor:
DPL parameters and similar features also include this type of link. It's a situation I often come across when searching for pages with complete %vsbattles.fandom.com% or %fandom.com% links to convert them to shortlinks. Def Jam pages, for example, have multiple instances of such links (def-jam-wrestling.fandom.com links that redirect to text), which can be quite frustrating. However, let's not dwell on it. I'm simply expressing how bothersome it can be at times, and it doesn't look great in the editor if used consecutively.
- 1,808
- 2,809
Okay, so there's nothing left to do here then?
- 164,926
- 71,611
Okay. I obviously agree about that our links should use standard formatting.
- 164,926
- 71,611
I don't think so, but it seems best to wait for a confirmation that we can close this thread.
- 1,808
- 2,809
Okay, let's wait for Bob.
- 14,811
- 12,229
We've already addressed one of these, and the rest feel like they could be left for other threads, if people still want to pursue them.
- 164,926
- 71,611
I agree with you about point two, regarding the feats sections.
Point three can obviously be handled elsewhere.
As for point four, I think that our current bullet point list format for feat sections seems fine to maintain/keep.
Point three can obviously be handled elsewhere.
As for point four, I think that our current bullet point list format for feat sections seems fine to maintain/keep.
Last edited:
Bobsican
He/Him- 21,175
- 6,089
- Thread starter
- #342
Okay, I finally found this thread, my notifications here got cleaned and so I struggled to find it.
Anyways, regarding the potential redundancy brought up for a note to a page that already has it, the thing is that we have more standard format pages than the one for characters, that proposal was meant to be added to all of them.
Anyways, regarding the potential redundancy brought up for a note to a page that already has it, the thing is that we have more standard format pages than the one for characters, that proposal was meant to be added to all of them.
- Status
