- 2,168
- 2,128
Suppose there is an entity that fits our bill for Non-duality type 2, as in, this entity is in "a nondual state regarding all dual systems within an entire level of reality in a way that makes them occupy both or neither state of the dualities."
Lets call the non-dual entity, entity 1, and put a new guy, let's call him entity 2. Let's also assume that both of them are completely abstract. Lets then say that Entity 2 is essentially the exact opposite of Entity 1, in pretty much everything.
Do we then assume that entity 2 is in a duality with entity 1? And thus, disqualifying entity 1s type 2 non-duality? Or do we assume that both function in higher levels where both have type 2 non-duality but exist in a sort of "meta-duallty"
I sort of know the logical answer to this, but I just want to know how exactly does the wiki treat stuff like this.
Lets call the non-dual entity, entity 1, and put a new guy, let's call him entity 2. Let's also assume that both of them are completely abstract. Lets then say that Entity 2 is essentially the exact opposite of Entity 1, in pretty much everything.
Do we then assume that entity 2 is in a duality with entity 1? And thus, disqualifying entity 1s type 2 non-duality? Or do we assume that both function in higher levels where both have type 2 non-duality but exist in a sort of "meta-duallty"
I sort of know the logical answer to this, but I just want to know how exactly does the wiki treat stuff like this.