Negative Theology Revisions

[Ionliosite]

I hope I don't get the already annoying comments of "nasuverse wanker"

Nasuverse wanker.

 

[Iiliminal]

Anos on very existent misfit solos weak root 1AH at 0%

 

[CloverDragon03]

No you literally don't. Staff-based threads are called staff based for a reason. You are not a staff member. Your opinion is irrelevant and all you're doing is derailing which is precisely why this thread was made staff-only initially yet I don't understand why you think you're entitled to keep talking about something you have absolutely no knowledge on. You do this every time. Can't you listen?

Any staff member that sees this, please delete any non-staff member comment and thread ban anyone that trespasses. This is already annoying.

Hate to burst your bubble, but this isn't a staff thread. There's a whole subcategory called Staff Discussion, and this was not placed there, and it was never said by the OP to be staff-only. OP only said they hope it can be changed to one

 

[Tdjwo]

Hate to burst your bubble, but this isn't a staff thread. There's a whole subcategory called Staff Discussion, and this was not placed there, and it was never said by the OP to be staff-only

It was indeed said by the OP to be staff only

If it's possible i hope this can changed into a staff thread cause I'm too lazy to rewrite again

Also my bad on the staff discussion part. I wanted to say "staff only"

Also, please delete all the clusters of irrelevant derailment. It's kinda hard to keep track of the good ones.

 

[Deagonx]

If you'd wanted this to be a staff thread, you could have posted it in the staff-discussion forum.

 

[Theoretical]

There's a whole subcategory called Staff Discussion, and this was not placed there, and it was never said by the OP to be staff-only. OP only said they hope it can be changed to one

It was intended to be one, "hope" was only used by acknowledging the possibility that it can't be one if it can be changed I'd obviously like that

 

[Theoretical]

If you'd wanted this to be a staff thread, you could have posted it in the staff-discussion forum.

I'm too lazy to rewrite again

 

[Deagonx]

It was intended to be one, "hope" was only used by acknowledging the possibility that it can't be one if it can be changed I'd obviously like that

Staff discussion threads aren't determined by intention, rather, location. Given that this thread is already like 45 comments of derailing, it would be prudent to just copy and paste a new thread there.

I'm too lazy to rewrite again

Ctrl + C and Ctrl + V

 

[CloverDragon03]

It was indeed said by the OP to be staff only

Also my bad on the staff discussion part. I wanted to say "staff only"

Also, please delete all the clusters of irrelevant derailment. It's kinda hard to keep track of the good ones.

Calc Group Members can't do that, that's a Thread Mod and up job afaik. I'm just the messenger

 

[Theoretical]

Staff discussion threads aren't determined by intention, rather, location. Given that this thread is already like 45 comments of derailing, it would be prudent to just copy and paste a new thread there.

Ight

 

[Tarang123]

Staying neutral on this for now but I’ll wait for arguments.

 

[Fixxed]

Aphopathic theology by default not have any connection to tiering system

 

[Tdjwo]

@Theoretical is it ok if this thread is closed as you make the new one on the staff discussion thread?

 

[Theoretical]

Aphopathic theology by default not have any connection to tiering system

Greatest argument from a vsbw member

 

[Theoretical]

is it ok if this thread is closed as you make the new one on the staff discussion thread?

Yes

 

[Tdjwo]

@Deagonx @CloverDragon03 sorry for taggin you both. Can you please close the thread?

 

[Deagonx]

Greatest argument from a vsbw member

Don't make mocking comments like this.

 

[Theoretical]

Don't make mocking comments like this.

I'm sorry but its very hard to write something as long as that just for someone to respond with "no that's not the case" but I digress

 

[Deagonx]

I'm sorry but its very hard to write something as long as that just for someone to respond with "no that's not the case" but I digress

That is not a good excuse. Do not do that in the future.

 

[Theoretical]

Nasuverse wanker.

It's cool when they do but it's a problem when I do it.

Staff discussion threads aren't determined by intention, rather, location. Given that this thread is already like 45 comments of derailing, it would be prudent to just copy and paste a new thread there.

Done

 

[ImmortalDread]

So are we going to continue here as any reasonable OP and will respond to people's relevant argumentative posts or simply pushing it to staff thread?

 

[Tdjwo]

So are we going to continue here as any reasonable OP and will respond to people's relevant argumentative posts or simply pushing it to staff thread?

No

 

[Deagonx]

I have closed this now.