• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Need help with inaccurate Dragon Maid calc

Curvature formula. You gotta re-do it with the new curvature formula.

And no, the explosion is very much real, in the anime, it creats a massive fireball that rapidly expands to cover the entire screen before the laser comes out.

I actually re-did the manga version using the new curvature formula and I got Island level for both peeps. I've yet to post it on a blog tho.

This and the cloud-splitting in the anime should use omnidirectional KE, (1/12) * mass * velocity^2
 
Last edited:
Well, I was told I used the wrong kind of clouds, so part of the reason for my making this is to figure out which is the correct one. Also, what do I find the mass of for the explosion part?
 
Well, I was told I used the wrong kind of clouds, so part of the reason for my making this is to figure out which is the correct one.
Go with cirrus clouds and cirrus density. It's on the Cloud Calculations page.

Also, what do I find the mass of for the explosion part?
Why would you try to find out the mass of an explosion? You already have the radius, just re-do the calc using the new curvature formula instead.
 
This and the cloud-splitting in the anime should use omnidirectional KE, (1/12) * mass * velocity^2

Sorry I interpreted this as you suggesting I calculate the explosion and cloud splitting feat using the same formula. So, what's the formula for curvature explosion?
 
So which version would be applied, then? Would there be any room for "likely/possibly 6-B" or something along those lines?
 
So which version would be applied, then? Would there be any room for "likely/possibly 6-B" or something along those lines?
Manga most likely takes precedence over anime in the case of AP here, anime can help add to context like timeframe or so, that much is fine.

But, in the anime adds the clouds, manga doesn't have the clouds.
 
So that means the cloud part can't be added, even as a "likely/possibly"?
Probably not. Only thing usable from the anime is the timeframe for the beam, sadly. Only the timeframe is usable for both the anime and the manga, since the beam itself overall happens in the same manner. And I already calc'd the beam speed.
 
https://media.**********.net/attachments/929194053285871636/929194075767308299/15_1.jpg?width=297&height=427

ye. Shitty scan, but ye.
Aight then, good to go, add the scan to the blog.
 
This seems pretty straightforward; do you think a CRT is necessary?
Doubt it. Doesn't scale to any other noteworthy person anyway AFAIK.

Plus you already posted the calc here so it's already part of a CRT.
 
So what is the conclusion here?
Basically, Arrogant's old calc was incorrect, I re-did it with the new curvature formula...

Until I was later informed I forgot to put the deg in the curvature formula so I did. AGAIN. That and I had to fix the circle to get a more perfect fit this time around.

Brand new calc here.
 
Please stop downgrading them ffs
Hey I like the lesbian dragons too, but it isn't just them that gets the downgrade, a lot of other curvature calcs get it too.

And y'all wonder why I don't like to calc anything beyond the Tier 9 to Tier 8 spectrum. Shit like this breaks a man's heart too many times to count.
 
Basically, Arrogant's old calc was incorrect, I re-did it with the new curvature formula...

Until I was later informed I forgot to put the deg in the curvature formula so I did. AGAIN. That and I had to fix the circle to get a more perfect fit this time around.

Brand new calc here.
Thats more justified, Guess we can apply it now
 
Back
Top