- 2,127
- 1,728
Immeasurable speed is confusing for me with the definition ,if somebody can give an example of immeasurable speed character with scan which is straightforward and blatant.
P.S - No DBH/DBXV .
P.S - No DBH/DBXV .
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Need Examples for immeasurable speed
- Thread starter Aachintya31
- Start date
- 8,102
- 9,544
The most blatant I am aware of.
- 5,879
- 1,075
- 2,127
- 1,728
- Thread starter
- #5
ok so physically travelling beyond normal 3-D space without use of teleporation ,portals or something similar is immeasurable speed.
- 5,879
- 1,075
No
Nope, a 2D line travelling 300 metres in a second wouldn't instantly be slower than any 3D being, same logic applies to 4D and above
- 2,127
- 1,728
- Thread starter
- #7
i see. but it still grants them immeasurable speed dont they ?
- 5,879
- 1,075
I just said it didn't
- 2,127
- 1,728
- Thread starter
- #9
ok thanks
- 452
- 487
what no? by the standards of this site? yeah cool.
- 5,879
- 1,075
Prove it does
- 2,127
- 1,728
- Thread starter
- #12
if a 3-D character travel in time (aka 4-D) via his physical speed ,he should have immeasurable speed.
it makes sense that a 4-D character who can travel in 5-D space is faster than the former but still both have immeasurable speed. No?
- 5,879
- 1,075
Time isn't 4D, dimensions are an axis, time isn't one
- 452
- 487
flying through x axis is immeasurable speed - Even a 5 year old could grasp it.
like i said, i could give two ***** when it comes to said speed cuz im not really a supporter of that stuff in general and it seems this site has different standards, so its just a waste of time.
- 2,127
- 1,728
- Thread starter
- #15
ok just consider it an axis.
a 3-D character who can travel in 4-D space via physical speed
a 4-D character who can travel in 5-D space via physical speed.
both have immeasurable speed .Right?
- 5,879
- 1,075
TheKingStrategist13
He/Him- 1,510
- 1,368
Mfw everyone and their mom consider's Time as the 4th Dimension:
Anyways, here, from the speed page directly:
"(Movement beyond linear time. This is why the speed cannot be measured. Given that S = D/T, if T is undefined the speed formula cannot be applied. This is the same reason why multiple temporal dimensions also grant immeasurable speed. For further information, see the "Further Explanations"-section below.)"
So, Immesurable Speed = Moving beyond Linear Time = Breaking the Speed Formula
In essence, it is that which would be undefined and beyond conventional speed rules.
- 2,127
- 1,728
- Thread starter
- #18
then where do you scale such speed movements ?
it has became a wrong intuition
TheKingStrategist13
He/Him- 1,510
- 1,368
Time is a perfectly valid axis. One with the right abilities can move back and forth on it, and in some cases even sideway's (Via multiple timelines). There is no reason for time to not be a Dimension. If you are capable of moving across Length and Width, that is 2-d. Add depth, that is 3-d. Naturally, if one can in addition move back and forth in time, that becomes 4-d.
- 2,127
- 1,728
- Thread starter
- #20
depends what theory we use.
Abstractly_a_Protagonist
He/Him- 1,675
- 1,430
I think this is blatant enough as an example.
- 5,879
- 1,075
Time is only theorized to be the 4th dimension
Back and forth in time aren't physical directions, that's not the same as 4 spatial dimensions, that's a temporal dimension which has very little to do with spatial dimensions
- 8,102
- 9,544
Time is a +1 to all spatial dimensions, therefor no matter which dimension you demonstrate Immeasurable speed in, you're still moving through the same temporal dimension. We consider time the fourth dimension because space as we know it is only three-dimensional, +1 temporal dimension making the universe 4D.
- 5,879
- 1,075
Source?
- 8,102
- 9,544
Anthropic principle - Wikipedia
- 5,879
- 1,075
The only things there that explain what you mentioned are from Weyl and Tangherlini's theories which aren't proven yetAnthropic principle - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
- 8,102
- 9,544
- 5,879
- 1,075
Yeah 4 dimensions not 4 spatial dimensions
- 8,102
- 9,544
I was just clarifying time is added onto spatial dimensons and is not limited to being the fourth dimension.
- 1,365
- 799
Both are right.
King says that moving through a higher spatial dimension DOESN'T grants inmeasurable speed, which is correct.
He is incorrect on the fact that time isn't a dimension (tho he seems aware it is, just not in the context he was referring in this convo /which are Spatial Dimensions/ ).
Spaceman is right on that fact that time is a dimension.
King says that moving through a higher spatial dimension DOESN'T grants inmeasurable speed, which is correct.
He is incorrect on the fact that time isn't a dimension (tho he seems aware it is, just not in the context he was referring in this convo /which are Spatial Dimensions/ ).
Spaceman is right on that fact that time is a dimension.
- 22,886
- 23,955
Here's a text example and a visual example of Immeasurable speed being used in a combative way.
Similar threads
