• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

[Nasuverse] Slash Emperor & Ea justifications adjustment

Status
Not open for further replies.

Migue79

He/Him
VS Battles
Calculation Group
2,536
2,121
I really hope this doesn't become a shitshow like most Nasuverse CRTs, especially with how laughably uncontroversial this really should be.

Heya, guys! Migue here with another Nasuverse CRT to revise something that has been bothering me for awhile now. I asked this ages ago in the Nasuverse Discussion thread, but no one was able to address this to me. And now after having consumed Notes., I can safely say the following isn't legit.

From Ea's page:
Enuma Elish ignores conventional durability (It shows the "Truth" of creation, functioning on the same principle as Slash Emperor, which can kill Ultimate Ones, the strongest beings of each planet in the Solar System, like Type Jupiter)
No use beating around the bush: this is definitely not legit because 'truth of creation' means different things within their own lores that never directly cross over. Now, why was this even said in the first place? Well, because in some Fate materials, Slash Emperor was stated to show the 'truth of the world' just like how Gil claimed 'Ea knows the truth of the world'. However, in the context of Notes., it just means to disperse the blood of Type-Pluto from the sky and show the actual colors of the planet's sky, which... is something different to what Ea does: universe cleaving/creating sword, whatever, you get my point. They're not functionally related at all.

So... Yeah, I propose this line of reasoning be removed from the justification at least.
 
Gil claimed 'Ea knows the truth of the world'.
I don't think claimed would be the right word, it did show the hellish landscape of the planet when he use it in FHA.

I think the justification need to be change to pealing away the texture of the planet.
 
I don't think claimed would be the right word, it did show the hellish landscape of the planet when he use it in FHA.

I think the justification need to be change to pealing away the texture of the planet.
Yeah, changing the justification to explain how Ea shows the "truth of the world" would be better.
 
Bumping this one more time…

Idk if it’s a 48 hour or 24 hour grace for this kind of thread…
 
Bumping this one more time…

Idk if it’s a 48 hour or 24 hour grace for this kind of thread…
From what I heard, controversial verse CRT might need 3 approval... but at the same time, this is so obvious that it doesn't really need more approval
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top