- 2,711
- 161
i think in the authors case (and any other author as well) they really never knew how strong they made thier characters. heck, we have dragon ball's who thought ssj3 was ssj2 for like, years lol
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Fine..."In the case of Might Gai", not a big deal.Kepekley23 said:Feat-scaling is not only not a valid practice, that calc ignores the fact that the Gates unleash the dormant limits inside each person, and of course, there's a vast difference between everyone when it comes to raw potential. When you look at Might Duy or Rock Lee those numbers fall apart extremely quickly, considering the former only went from tier 8 to tier 7 by using either the seventh or eighth gate (implied to be the latter), and the latter went from Town level to Mountain level by using the Seventh Gate.
Actually, It is the same thing. If you disagree, fine, doesn't make it wrong.Kepekley23 said:Except it isn't the same thing at all, as these phrases are commonly used to mean "inbetween this number and the next highest thing".
Tens of times or dozens of times means between 10 and 100, maximum generosity.
The multiplier is wrong anyway.
Except the crux in this argument is that you guys are arbitrarily asserting an "End" to an otherwise Unquantifiable terminology.Lorenzo.r.2nd said:@final i agree with kep because this is simply the case for this, well, case, but i see what u mean. tens of tens could in turn be 1 mil, but not 10 billion (going by what was stated above) my man. its really, really stretching it. i see ur point, but things have limits. not limits, but rather, end points where it turns into something else, which is kinda what happens here. its really simple, the statement, while actually technically correct, is still wrong, as tens of times and millions of times are too huge of a difference from one to the other
I get that, but do you see what I mean when the terminology is basically the same? It doesn't matter what terminology you use, "Billions, Millions, Hundreds, Tens", etc. Its the same shit, just bigger values are easiest to quantify. Less work, etc.Lorenzo.r.2nd said:like i said, i see what both of u mean, but in this case, its not 5+5+5=5x5= 20, but more like 10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10= whatever.. u see?