Multiverse hypothetical question

[omegabronic]

Here it is accepted that MWI(Many Worlds Interpretation) is 2-B because of every possibility becoming a new universe, but the question is, what if a verse says that not only all possibilities become a new universe, but all impossibilities as well? would that be a higher level of 2-B than MWI?

 

[AzuRizzz]

Depends on what kind of "impossible" it is

 

[omegabronic]

Depends on what kind of "impossible" it is

What do you mean?

 

[BestMGQScalerEver]

Sounds kinda vague. Would need to be elaborated upon.

 

[Murayefeskamus]

What do you mean?

He's probably asking what the use of the word "impossible" is, it's too vague. A clear interpretation cannot be made.

 

[ImmortalDread]

No, it won't be higher than 2-B

 

[omegabronic]

No, it won't be higher than 2-B

but would it be a higher degree 2-B?

 

[ImmortalDread]

but would it be a higher degree 2-B?

I don't think so.

 

[omegabronic]

I don't think so.

i mean, if all possibilities becoming space times = baseline countless 2-B, then if all impossibilities also do, then it would be 2x countless 2-B, or am i misinterpreting something?

 

[ImmortalDread]

You need to really define what is impossibilities in verse.

 

[omegabronic]

You need to really define what is impossibilities in verse.

everything that is impossible to happen, like, imagine MWI, every possibility for the future becomes a different universe, so if all impossibilities, aka everything that is not possible to happen in the future, also become real, wouldn't that be higher?

 

[ImmortalDread]

Eh, not sure if impossibility will hold any value or the same importance as possibility

Is there any scan to elaborate that?

 

[omegabronic]

Eh, not sure if impossibility will hold any value or the same importance as possibility

Is there any scan to elaborate that?

oh that is not about any verse, i just got curious about this for a while, since i first heard of MWI i had this curiosity

 

[ImmortalDread]

Oh alright.

Regarding your question, as I said, this would be same question if illogical will hold the same value as logical

 

[omegabronic]

Oh alright.

Regarding your question, as I said, this would be same question if illogical will hold the same value as logical

Wdym?