• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Multi-Planet level

Messages
496
Reaction score
247
Why is "Multi-Planet level no longer a valid term? I still see people use it to this very day and is there a way to still calc it?
 
A lot of our tiers used to be flexible with the terms; 9-A used to have Room level and Small Building level equally valid, High 7-A used to be Large Mountain level as well as Small Island level (Which implies destroying tiny islands would make someone that tier). 5-A used to have Multi-Planet level as well as Large Planet level, but there have been calcs of destroying 2 Earth sized planets relatively close to each other getting 5-B. Which it was decided a baseline for 5-A should be based on a familiar easy to determine obstacle and Uranus was what was decided since that's the smallest Gas Giant in our solar system.

We made a thread deciding a specific name for each tier, and Large Planet was simply favored over Multi-Planet due to having an easier than to baseline off of.
 
5-A used to have Multi-Planet level as well as Large Planet level, but there have been calcs of destroying 2 Earth sized planets relatively close to each other getting 5-B.
Nope, blowing up Mars from Earth actually went really deep into High 5-A, that's why Multi-Planet was abandoned.

Doing it the other way around would wield Low 4-C.

Ratings would be Low 4-C if you assumed the explosion was set off in the dead center between them and blew them both up (Since the explosion would need enough juice to blow up Earth too).
 
Last edited:
Nope, blowing up Mars from Earth actually went really deep into High 5-A, that's why Multi-Planet was abandoned.

Doing it the other way around would wield Low 4-C.

Ratings would be Low 4-C if you assumed the explosion was set off in the dead center between them and blew them both up (Since the explosion would need enough juice to blow up Earth too).
Really? That's more than I would've expected
 
Hmm, yeah that is pretty crazy now that I think about it
so yeah, as you can imagine only an explosion that can nuke a dwarf star or a star could destroy that much. That's why multi-planet is simply useless since it nominatively undermines the true power of the attack.
 
That's fair, I just assumed if you destroyed multiple planets minus the main star your "Multi-Planet level", but I understand now
 
Back
Top