• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Taikyoku is the origins of all things meaning it's the origins of the concepts of space-time
https://media.discordapp.net/attach...7346351112192/image0.png?width=665&height=625
https://media.discordapp.net/attach...86251976724/image1-4.png?width=638&height=625
Every taikyoku paints over the other and views the lower values as fiction.
https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/829014038587375646/829017342876450826/image0.png https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/829014038587375646/829017479984447548/image1.png https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/829014038587375646/829014232489394246/image1.png
this would mean the second taikyoku would be 1-A by definition by conceptually transcending the concepts of space-time

So anyone who can manipulate taikyoku or in generally someone having a taikyoku value would determine how much layers into 1-A they are.
 
You don't need to delete this thread.

Just contact (Go onto their profiles and post a message, make sure to link this thread) either a Thread Moderator (They have a red-bar under their name) or an Administrator (They have a green-bar under their name), The'll close this thread for you.
 
Taikyoku is the origins of all things meaning it's the origins of the concepts of space-time
https://media.discordapp.net/attach...7346351112192/image0.png?width=665&height=625
https://media.discordapp.net/attach...86251976724/image1-4.png?width=638&height=625
Every taikyoku paints over the other and views the lower values as fiction.
https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/829014038587375646/829017342876450826/image0.png https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/829014038587375646/829017479984447548/image1.png https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/829014038587375646/829014232489394246/image1.png
this would mean the second taikyoku would be 1-A by definition by conceptually transcending the concepts of space-time

So anyone who can manipulate taikyoku or in generally someone having a taikyoku value would determine how much layers into 1-A they are.
Just saying, this doesn't count for 1-A, it'd be Low 1-C lol
 
My guy Masada got nuked a while ago lol-

I am privy to an ongoing revision and cosmology blog, and Light is back so a translation of K3 is possible, so I imagine the verse will be back new and improved with time.
 
Explain Why
1-A would be completely beyond dimensions and such(mind you I'm 99% sure most of the scans for 1-A and above Masadaverse are either mistranslated or fake), even if you were conceptually beyond space-time, that by itself is only 5-D, you'd need a lot of context to bring that all the way up to a tier that needs as much proofing and context at 1-A
 
Shinza is also a deleted verse with horrible translations and is going through a drastic revision behind the scenes so does it really matter whether or not it's 1-A.
 
1-A would be completely beyond dimensions and such(mind you I'm 99% sure most of the scans for 1-A and above Masadaverse are either mistranslated or fake), even if you were conceptually beyond space-time, that by itself is only 5-D, you'd need a lot of context to bring that all the way up to a tier that needs as much proofing and context at 1-A
1. The scans aren't mistranslated or fake

2. What kind of context are you talking about? Being beyond the applications of conceptual space-time is quite literally the definition of 1-A. And it wouldn't be logical to apply a dimensional tiering to a character that's completely beyond the concept of dimensionality. If you need me to explain how concepts work I can.
 
Well done with K3 and PL blog, waiting to finish Avesta and also waiting on Tarang and the rest. But yeah everything should go smoothly, slow but smooth
Awesome sauce.

That was all I wanted to ask, can't wait for Shinza's return. And a ******* K3 translation. This can be closed now.
 
This is a lie tho


Anyway the verse is deleted already but I still feel like I should correct what the OP said that’s wrong
I've already seen quite a few of the scans often used for 1-A, if there are others then id be happy to accept them if they're right
1. The scans aren't mistranslated or fake

2. What kind of context are you talking about? Being beyond the applications of conceptual space-time is quite literally the definition of 1-A. And it wouldn't be logical to apply a dimensional tiering to a character that's completely beyond the concept of dimensionality. If you need me to explain how concepts work I can.
I never said the scans for this thread were.

I'm talking about the kind of context and proof like how space-time is assumed to be 4-D automatically, so they'd only be above 4-D conceptually, so you'd have to prove that space-time consistently means all dimensions and also does in this context.
 
I've already seen quite a few of the scans often used for 1-A, if there are others then id be happy to accept them if they're right

I never said the scans for this thread were.

I'm talking about the kind of context and proof like how space-time is assumed to be 4-D automatically, so they'd only be above 4-D conceptually, so you'd have to prove that space-time consistently means all dimensions and also does in this context.
The second taikyoku would be above the concepts of dimensionality already since it's conceptually above the first taikyoku which is the origin of all things; therefore, it would equate to being the origins of the concepts of dimensionality. So, the second Taikyoku is conceptually above the concept of dimensionality. So, it would be above all dimensions since it's the concept.
 
The second taikyoku would be above the concepts of dimensionality already since it's conceptually above the first taikyoku which is the origin of all things; therefore, it would equate to being the origins of the concepts of dimensionality. So, the second Taikyoku is conceptually above the concept of dimensionality. So, it would be above all dimensions since it's the concept.
Just "being above the concept of dimensions" isn't enough for 1-A when the nature of those dimensions and what exactly is meant by being above them isn't made clear at all.

Even then, every scan here was likely already addressed when the verse was downgraded from High 1-A, then from 1-A.

Anyway, the verse was deleted so there's no point to the thread. Closing this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top