- 3,228
- 1,288
What needs to be done now?
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Marvel Comics: Herald-tier Speed Downgrade
- Thread starter Osemere
- Start date
- 778
- 929
- Thread starter
- #42
The removal was accepted, just need a consensus to what we should revert the speed values to
Last edited:
- 3,228
- 1,288
If Gladiator's webarchive calc is still viable, we should use that.
- 177,796
- 90,868
Somebody likely needs to investigate a bit regarding the speed validations that are listed in our Marvel Comics verse page and its characters profile pages. 
- 12,875
- 8,718
bro who cares theyre all basically the same speed lmao
In all seriousness my opinions on how we should deal with Comics speed ratings are very controversial so I don't think I'm much help in this thread, only responding since I got tagged, sorry.
- 3,228
- 1,288
Do you know if Gladiator's web archive speed feat is still usable?
Excellence616
He/Him- 6,971
- 5,112
Yes but we need to recalc it or check if the web archive calc is accurate.
- 778
- 929
- Thread starter
- #49
Okay. How do we go about doing that?
- 177,796
- 90,868
You can copy its content to a VS Battles Wiki blog post, give credit to the original calcer, and ask our calc group members for help with evaluating if it is reliable.
- 778
- 929
- Thread starter
- #51
I just checked again and found that it was already done here:You can copy its content to a VS Battles Wiki blog post, give credit to the original calcer, and ask our calc group members for help with evaluating if it is reliable.
Gladiator Blitzes Heimdall
vsbattles.fandom.com
So that’s rather convenient. Is it fine if I apply this, now?
- 177,796
- 90,868
No calc group member has accepted it yet.I just checked again and found that it was already done here:
Gladiator Blitzes Heimdall
So that’s rather convenient. Is it fine if I apply this, now?
- 3,228
- 1,288
No it wasn't, the web archive feat is Gladiator re-adjusting for time dilation, not blitzing Heimdal.I just checked again and found that it was already done here:
Gladiator Blitzes Heimdall
So that’s rather convenient. Is it fine if I apply this, now?
- 778
- 929
- Thread starter
- #54
Is it necessary to do that if we can just use that one? Or would we consider it illegitimate (even when it’s faster than the time dilation thing?)
- 3,228
- 1,288
I guess people prefer not to rely on webarchive links.
- 778
- 929
- Thread starter
- #56
I think I’d be easier to use the one already on the profile. But Ant said that it hasn’t been approved despite being 8 years old and already accepted on a profile?
- 3,228
- 1,288
Wouldn't that be an Infinite speed feat, crossing the infinite distance between the material universe and Asgard?
- 778
- 929
- Thread starter
- #58
Unfortunately probably yes, as I’m looking back over it. We might have to just go with the Gladiator time dilation instance, but I’d rather review it first to make sure there aren’t similar problems.
- 3,228
- 1,288
- 778
- 929
- Thread starter
- #60
That would have to be done in a different thread, most likely. I think there would probably be some problems in it as well. I’ll try to make a blog with the time dilation instance soon, though.
- 3,228
- 1,288
I'll make a blog for the other feats to actually put numbers on them, later.
- 3,228
- 1,288
- 177,796
- 90,868
You should ask for help here:
Calculation Evaluations (New forum)
This thread is intended for users to link to new blog post calculations, to relay them to the community, and have them evaluated by the calculation group, without contacting the members individually. To evaluate important off-site calculations, preferably copy them to blog posts in this wiki...
You can mention that I would also appreciate the help if you wish.
- 4,911
- 2,190
Your second calc says starbrand and Captain Marvel, you should read the description of the images because it's not starbrand it's Firelord.
- 3,228
- 1,288
My bad, not sure how I missed that.
- 3,228
- 1,288
Is there a consensus on whether Gladiator's webarchive calc is usable?
- 778
- 929
- Thread starter
- #69
It’s currently used on his page so I would assume so, but your blog ought to be reviewed soon so we could just use that optimally
- 3,228
- 1,288
I posted it on the evaluations thread and I reached out to a calc group member to review it, but it'll probably get lost in the sea of evaluation requests.
I wish I was a calc-group member so I could make a dent in the evaluation requests.
- 3,228
- 1,288
Bump.
- 177,796
- 90,868
You can include a note about that I would appreciate if they help you out in this case.
- 3,228
- 1,288
Thanks, I did.You can include a note about that I would appreciate if they help you out in this case.
- 3,228
- 1,288
Bumper cars.
- 3,228
- 1,288
We need to figure out if Gladiator's webarchive feat is usable and my blog needs to get evaluated.What currently needs to be done here?
- 3,228
- 1,288
Aye, Aye, Captain!If you link to it here, I can ping some calc group members, but it is more likely that they will help out via our regular evaluation requests thread.
Edit: (The link is to the blog)
- 177,796
- 90,868
If you link to it here, I can ping some calc group members, but it is more likely that they will help out via our regular evaluation requests thread.
@Therefir @TheRustyOne @Armorchompy @Migue79 @Psychomaster35 @Dalesean027
Are any of you willing to take a look at this please?
