-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Marvel and DC boundless atoms scale debunk
- Thread starter PapaNihil
- Start date
- 946
- 829
Tiktok scalers be making me proud.
- 3,060
- 1,293
common sense lel
- 10,677
- 4,743
no. They are like Low 2C to 3A at best considering each atom contains a universe nothing more
- 19
- 1
- Thread starter
- #5
Well the scale seem to claim that those atomic universes contain CU. Are there any scales I can use to debunk the atom wank?
- 19
- 1
- Thread starter
- #6
Actually i found it on quora
- 19
- 1
- Thread starter
- #7
I mean yeah but I would need something more concrete to say atoms are not infinite layers into boundless ya know.
- 19
- 1
- Thread starter
- #8
Here is a link to one of the scales iv seen used.
fictonialmythos.quora.com
Debate: DC and Marvel atoms (me) vs Featherine (Xvoltron) #1
Judge is Drained and the rules for the debate here: https://qr.ae/pr1XGg Aight before we start scaling, it should be noted that crossovers between DC and Marvel are canon so their cosmology scaling can be used for each other. https://www.quora.com/How-was-there-a-Canon-crossover-between-DC-and-...
- 974
- 248
i aint reading all that but i think those guy using other wiki standart for scalling
- 19
- 1
- Thread starter
- #10
Nope they use vs battle wiki. And on occasion CSAP. Basically the rub down is atoms contain universes and universes are made everytime someone makes a decision therefore atoms contain infinite universes and each of those universes has a CU which is how they scale the atoms. Is there a way I can debunk this?
- 946
- 829
I see just 2-C and 2-A in these atoms since some scans stated for them to contain universes and even infinite universes, its absurd to believe an atom in these verses can be tier 0.Here is a link to one of the scales iv seen used.
Debate: DC and Marvel atoms (me) vs Featherine (Xvoltron) #1
Judge is Drained and the rules for the debate here: https://qr.ae/pr1XGg Aight before we start scaling, it should be noted that crossovers between DC and Marvel are canon so their cosmology scaling can be used for each other. https://www.quora.com/How-was-there-a-Canon-crossover-between-DC-and-...
- 19
- 1
- Thread starter
- #12
And what about 2C and 2A? Do you find those valid because I find even than to be far fetched
- 2,019
- 1,081
wdym with wank, those are true
- 946
- 829
I find them valid as they are consistently stated though in a weird way, as you know atoms are very very small, then it's fiction anything is possible.
- 5,264
- 2,171
The scan saying an atom contains universe is not even in the regular universe but in some completely different dimension.
- 19
- 1
- Thread starter
- #17
So you think atoms are beyond boundless than? Also what scan supports atoms containing CU?
- 2,019
- 1,081
yes
- 19
- 1
- Thread starter
- #19
I can't tell if this is genuine or not.
- 974
- 248
i honestly dont think it possible to composite those 2 verse
Last edited:
- 5,264
- 2,171
Why
- 946
- 829
He didn't actually both verse do indeed mention and show the atoms contains universes in them, besides Marvel and DC share the same writers. And I disagree for this atom ***** to ever be used.
- 974
- 248
why did he say "crossover between DC and marvel are canon so their cosmology scalling can be used for each other"?
- 5,264
- 2,171
Probably a fanboy.
- 974
- 248
hope the quora guy scalling got accepted we need to make lucifer above SRE fr
- 2,019
- 1,081
because it is legit FRA
- 5,264
- 2,171
What are your arguments
Because nothing the dude on quora said is above 2-A. Maybe you can argue high complex multiversal at best.
- 974
- 248
random question what all type of multiverse tier
Deleted member 2530
Guest
Is there any proof that these atomic Universe have universes inside them? Also, the DC scan doesn't really look solid with using scans from Pre Crisis for whatever reason. The fact the "Microverse" is called the Sub atomic Foundation of Creation doesn't raise any confidence in it having some further smaller creations inside it.
- 5,264
- 2,171
Sorry, can you repeat that in other words?
If you mean by type 1, 2, 3 and 4 multiverses by Max Tegmark then they don't have a specific tier. For example type four multiverse can range anywhere between high hyperversal to boundless.
- 974
- 248
type 3 tier?
- 5,264
- 2,171
Really just depends on the verse. It can range from 2-A to high 1-C
- 3,346
- 1,902
This got debunked by the comics themselves, franklin richards said that models of worlds within atoms were wrong
- 5,264
- 2,171
Can you please post the link?
- 3,346
- 1,902
- 5,264
- 2,171
Thanks! That is enough evidence
nvm , wasnt franklin but the point still stands
Vondoom
Username Only- 395
- 131
Is there anything wrong with using pre-crisis?
- 19
- 1
- Thread starter
- #38
Ok so now he is saying that the reason atoms scale beyond "irrelevant layers into boundless" is because they have "decisions create a new universe with R>F transcendence universes" also what is a good debunk for DC?
nvm , wasnt franklin but the point still stands
- 5,264
- 2,171
Yeah, no, there are scans in marvel saying universes are "parallel" or "adjusted" which you know, isn't R>F transcendence at all.
As for DC, universes inside atoms would automatically be inferior to normal 3-D universes. So that would make them infinite hierarchy of 3-D universes.
