- 2,151
- 2,108
What?That indeed is not enough
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What?That indeed is not enough
How to have Acausality Type 5?Having NEP 2 or TD 2/3 =/= having ACA 5
Proof of uninteractable because of causality.How to have Acausality Type 5?
How to have Acausality Type 5?
Yeahhhhhh nuke that shitHaving NEP 2 or TD 2/3 =/= having ACA 5
There's a verse that actually qualifies after all this time?There are few verses that qualify for it so it shouldn't be nukee
There is a possibility all chief gods getting TD2 but I need to re read many chapters.Guys, start thinking a new description for Anos, Graham and Arcana to suit with TD 3. And also if you want for Eques since he was accepted as TD 2, although how ironic that Eques being TD 2 can negate TD 3 ahahahahah
All Chief gods are born from the will of the world. Eques is same. Graham just pumped up his process faster that's all. Each chief god has same Physiology.If they share a similar nature to Eques then sure.
TD 3 negationGuys, start thinking a new description for Anos, Graham and Arcana to suit with TD 3. And also if you want for Eques since he was accepted as TD 2, although how ironic that Eques being TD 2 can negate TD 3 ahahahahah
Eques and Graham has that.Dayum, MGK now has serious rare hax in their verse.
Have they finally changed the description? Also, Anos literally has a feat of the order of causality that governs all things causality related (hell if the order didn't exist causality wouldn't exist) couldn't affect his source.There are few verses that qualify for it so it shouldn't be nukee
NopeSo has anyone thought of a new description for Anos, Graham, and Arcana TD 3?
Standards are still pretty much the same. Anos case was brought up a lot of times and everytime was rejected because all the evidence we presented simply isn't enoughHave they finally changed the description? Also, Anos literally has a feat of the order of causality that governs all things causality related (hell if the order didn't exist causality wouldn't exist) couldn't affect his source.
Why doesn't he qualify?
For Graham we shpuld post Anahem feat of uninteractability of his nothingnessSo has anyone thought of a new description for Anos, Graham, and Arcana TD 3?
Wasn't it only rejected by agnaa?Standards are still pretty much the same. Anos case was brought up a lot of times and everytime was rejected because all the evidence we presented simply isn't enough
Yes which means it doesn't qualifyWasn't it only rejected by agnaa?
No, in fact order is transcend the world, order in its default nature is changeless. He cant use other orderdifferent gods orders
No characters qualify*I don't see the problem, It simply doesn't qualify
I didn't say their order, I said its effects that have happened. For example, let's use during the period sargeldonave was active. Traces of what happened would be left behind so he should be able to manifest those traces.No, in fact order is transcend the world, order in its default nature is changeless. He cant use other order
Seems like type 2 acausalityUnconventional Resistance to Fate manipulation (Fate affects a persons future. He exists only at the beginning of time and is this immune to change. Stuff like Eques predetermined fate should work on him)
Is fine thenI didn't say their order, I said its effects that have happened. For example, let's use during the period sargeldonave was active. Traces of what happened would be left behind so he should be able to manifest those traces.
No, it's past and futureSeems like type 2 acausality
Was told you need to not exist in past and future to qualify for type 2Seems like type 2 acausality
Ya, past and futureWas told you need to not exist in past and future to qualify for type 2
That's just an assumption, existing at the beginning of time but having no future means he only exists in the past.If he only exists at the beginning of time and doesn't have future(he couldn't get past beginning of time that one point) then that means he also doesn't have past