Magic: The Gathering 1-A Upgrade

[Udlmaster]

We have already gone trough this, the multiverse is infinite, the ammount of universes inside it are not.

I mean, yeah, that's what I'm saying.

im confused about the planes because of this statement

it says here that Planes can be infinite expanses of matter and the narrator said planes were infinite

but then ugin said its not

Eldrazi destroy Planes when they arrive, very quickly if the Plane isn't as stable (We see Ulamog alone destroy a Plane in the time it takes for 1 brief battle with Nahiri and Sorin vs his Lineage destroy the Plane they were defending)

So the issue here isn't the amount of surface area they can destroy. It's the amount of Planes they can destroy, and the number of Planes is finite.

 

[Robo432343]

if the number of planes are finite the rating should have been 2-B all this time instead of possibly 2-A on the profiles right

 

[Robo432343]

bump

 

[Voidnether]

Shouldn't this be renamed to like 2-B, possibly 2-A because 1-A is just flat out rejected with the anti-feats that exist in the verse?

 

[deonment]

if the number of planes are finite the rating should have been 2-B all this time instead of possibly 2-A on the profiles right

Not really, considering how the people who scale to 2-A scale to the multiverse as a whole rather than destroying all planes, so even if the number of planes are finite, the fact is they scale to something that is still at minimum infinite 4D in scope

Shouldn't this be renamed to like 2-B, possibly 2-A because 1-A is just flat out rejected with the anti-feats that exist in the verse?

What?
Nobody scales to the blind eternities or the true forms of the Eldrazi bar like, the ******* Ur Dragon who scales above the entire verse either way (and scales to D&D actually)

 

[Robo432343]

Is MTG canon to DnD??

 

[Qawsedf234]

Is MTG canon to DnD??

They've had official crossovers for both mediums and WotC/Hazbro owns both. But I don't think they're canon to each other currently. But afaik author WoG regarding the products state they're non-canon or at least non-canon on MtG end.

If they were then the Eldrazi would probably just be FR monsters and 1-A in their true forms.

 

[Udlmaster]

Not really, considering how the people who scale to 2-A scale to the multiverse as a whole rather than destroying all planes, so even if the number of planes are finite, the fact is they scale to something that is still at minimum infinite 4D in scope

What?
Nobody scales to the blind eternities or the true forms of the Eldrazi bar like, the ******* Ur Dragon who scales above the entire verse either way (and scales to D&D actually)

Isn't the Ur-Dragon inferior to the Eldrazi Titans?

 

[deonment]

They've had official crossovers for both mediums and WotC/Hazbro owns both. But I don't think they're canon to each other currently. But afaik author WoG regarding the products state they're non-canon or at least non-canon on MtG end.

I mean, on the side of the WoG, IIRC the only think Mark Rosewater says was that they were still separate multiverses, nothing about canon, meanwhile we have the Strixhaven stuff, Guildmasters Guide to Ravnica, the Theros Adventure, and the multiple free adventures published on D&Ds side, and the two D&D sets (that aren't Universes Beyond like the rest of the crossovers MtG has, all while being black boarder) definitely indicate towards them existing in the same ""setting""

Isn't the Ur-Dragon inferior to the Eldrazi Titans?

I remember reading somewhere that the Ur-Dragon's conceptual/true form (if it even has one and isn't just an abstract being outright) encompasses the totality of the blind eternities, but I can't find it either way, so shrug, ignore that bit and either way, doesn't really change my point

 

[Robo432343]

bump

 

[Udlmaster]

I remember reading somewhere that the Ur-Dragon's conceptual/true form (if it even has one and isn't just an abstract being outright) encompasses the totality of the blind eternities, but I can't find it either way, so shrug, ignore that bit and either way, doesn't really change my point

I can't imagine that being true.

The closest I know is that "it's wings that extend across the eternities" but that's just fancy writing to say it travelled across the Blind Eternities, like "its wings blanketed the sky"

 

[Robo432343]

bump

 

[Robo432343]

bump

 

[Udlmaster]

BTW, I've Platonics in MTG.

My Midas touch to turn all verses I'm interested in to 1-A continues.

I'll keep you posted.

 

[Udlmaster]

Okay, yeah, update, seems that Magic ties to Platonic concepts and allows you to emulate them into reality;

Jodah said nothing, and Lim-Dul continued, “When you cast the spell, you envisioned that which you would create, a perfect ‘chair’ that you were trying to emulate. I have heard, and I believe, that there is an ultimate ‘chair’ somewhere that we both model our thoughts from—one that has the basics of all ‘chair-ness.’ Does this ring any bells?”

 

[Udlmaster]

I will be working on Magic in my private time, you can see my blog for updates on how that's going.

 

[Robo432343]

I will be working on Magic in my private time, you can see my blog for updates on how that's going.

then your blog can be a continuation of this thread

so this thread should be closed because you have a way better blog