Low 2-C and "Non-Infinite Universes"

[Endou_God_Hand]

Let's say a universe is not infinite in size, but it still has things like space time... if a character destroys, creates, or fuses with spacetime itself does that mean they're Low 2-C because spacetime / the time axis is still 4-D? Or no.

To my knowledge to be Low 2-C you jsut have to scale to a 4-D construct.

 

[FinePoint]

By our current standards, Low 2-C requires the 4D object to be universal in scale.

However, some people think that's illogical, and there's a planned revision "soon".

 

[Endou_God_Hand]

By our current standards, Low 2-C requires the 4D object to be universal in scale.

However, a lot of people agree that's illogical, and there's a planned revision "soon".

Hmmmmm... I see. Thank you! I have another addon if you do not mind?

If the universe is not currently (or physically) infinite in size, but is stated to have the capability of being infinite or say is infinite in another way (The unvierse isn't physically infinite but it can hold infinite concepts or "information") does that count for anything?

 

[FinePoint]

Hmmmmm... I see. Thank you! I have another addon if you do not mind?

If the universe is not currently (or physically) infinite in size, but is stated to have the capability of being infinite or say is infinite in another way (The unvierse isn't physically infinite but it can hold infinite concepts or "information") does that count for anything?

Well both concepts and information don't technically take up physical space, so probably not.

 

[Endou_God_Hand]

Well both concepts and information don't technically take up physical space, so probably not.

I see, well thank you regardless!

 

[Zack_Schewelder]

Well both concepts and information don't technically take up physical space, so probably not.

I think both of these things have physical space and what you mean here technically, but technically itself is exponential in information and concepts, in terms of their relation to physical space, if the problem is technical, both of these things can contain physical space, if both of these things are used in a way that reifies it.

 

[FinePoint]

I think both of these things have physical space and what you mean here technically, but technically itself is exponential in information and concepts, in terms of their relation to physical space, if the problem is technical, both of these things can contain physical space, if both of these things are used in a way that reifies it.

A medium of information and what a concept governs usually takes up physical space, but the arbitrary subjects themselves do not.

 

[Zack_Schewelder]

A medium of information and what a concept governs usually takes up physical space, but the arbitrary subjects themselves do not.

First, the information issued does not have a physical space, but because of the influence of the information, it can be used as a physical space, so the information requires a support that can make it a physical space or material that is physically tangible, because to realize the material physically, assistance is needed, so the pure correlation is in the variable, which can be said that the information has a physical space if it is realized operationally, then the "information" occurs in the physical space itself.

You can see it directly, a world filled with various physical materials, which exist because they are placed in the information itself.