- 167,692
- 76,283
This is fine with me as well.Elizhaa said:I am fine with compromising on leaving the rating as At least Low 1-A, likely 1-A
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is fine with me as well.Elizhaa said:I am fine with compromising on leaving the rating as At least Low 1-A, likely 1-A
Specifically, these are adimensional objects that can be found in universes with an emphasis on very advanced mathematics and geometry, such as ultimate ensembles, or in universes where there are characters with various dimensionless characteristics. |
I can't decide on what type of Transduality they may have though.ZacharyGrossman273 said:Seems fine
Transduality, as is used/portrayed in fiction, is mainly a philosophical or theological concept, although its foundations lay within real logic and mathematics. However, even though we can construct non-dual mathematical and logical models, this, similar to our inability to perceive higher dimensions of space and time, will not allow us to truly grasp the scope of non-dual systems, since the foundations of our logic (classical logic within mathematics) are all based off binary distinctions |
A basic example of Plurality is characters whose fundamental nature operates under many-valued or certain kinds of non-classical logic, where many different values can exist that are not true or false, 0/1/2, or any dichotomies in betwee. However, simply being able to use many-valued logic in a feat context does not qualify a character for this type, such characters must demonstrate true qualitative superiority to all types of dual distinctions. Naturally, only 1-A characters and up can have this type, as it exists outside all possible dual distinctions. |
It would be Type 3, being Non-dual isn't many valued, it's not 0 or 1.Threemagi said:Would an embodiment/creator of Type IV Multiverse has Transduality? If so, what Type?
Type 4 seems like its explicitly outside the reach of Goddess/Downstreamers, so maybe Type 2? Or 3?
Well, yes, Type 4 already said so ; being able to use many-valued logic Ôëá having Type 4 Transduality.Udlmaster said:It would be Type 3, being Non-dual isn't many valued, it's not 0 or 1.
Okay thenAntvasima said:Never mind. You can probably start to edit the pages. If you write the exact page titles here, I can unlock them for you with my automated script.
Exactly. Goddess/downstreamers is the reverse of Type 4 description. They can possibly use other logic systems, but not explicitly said to qualify by Type 4's own description.Udlmaster said:No, besides your transdualism, being Transdual doesn't give you any powers
@Ultima Reality I may have found context to this :Ultima Reality said:I'd say "At least Low 1-A, likely 1-A" is good for them based on the scans. The Goddess could be higher if more context to the "hierarchy of Manifolds" thing appears.
`You may be right that we come from different alternate realities, Malenfant. Two strands in some higher-order manifold of possible universes. If so, the strands don't seem to run in neat parallel lines, like lanes on a highway, do they? They must - touch - in a more complicated way. Here, in Phobos. And maybe other places like it.' He shook his head, trying to clear his thoughts. | ||
~ World Engines : Destroyer |
`Impossible,' Emma said. `Experienced, impossible or not,' Bartholomew said. `There's probably a logic to all this,' Emma said. 'Just as there is probably a logic to having those five hoops in a space where only four hoops can exist. It's just that it's a - higher - logic than we are capable of seeing.' `Yeah,' Malenfant said, thinking hard. | ||
~ World Engines : Destroyer |