- 8,673
- 1,968
Hello everyone. This is Seed here. Since the evidence for this upgrade is already on deck and accepted on the Looney Tunes Toon Physiology page, I'm not going to be making this into some essay long argument. The argument is pretty simple.
Extremely early into Looney Tunes' career, Looney Tunes' very own Slyester the Cat breaks the fourth wall here:
() .
He basically explains away what he's doing as 'Anything is possible within a Cartoon' . Now, am I saying this is free reign to say that it can become High 1-A or anything ? Absolutely not (Though I know it can be argued, I'm just not making that argument and I'm definitely not recommending anyone making that argument here unless Looney Tunes pulls some genuinely High 1-A stuff lol). What I am suggesting from this is that Looney Tunes has a built-in explanation and internal logic that they are using to justify why Looney Tunes can do all these crazy feats., including... you guessed it, interacting with their Authors/Animators, even for the Low-Tiers. Normally, we'd have to play a guessing game as to what the internal logic of a verse is, but here it is literally spelled out for you, so there is no guessing game needed.
What I am saying however is that because of Looney Tunes have a built-in explanation as to how the Toons can interact with their Authors/Animators, I do believe R>F Looney Tunes has more merit. The justification for R>F was on the profiles , so it would just require looking into it's history to bring it back up again. Keep in mind this isn't an upgrade, just essentially a thread to clarify that Looney Tunes has a built-in explanation as to why such things are possible within Looney Tunes. IF this is accepted, I'll correlate with others to make such an upgrade thread, considering how R>F Toons is really obvious as even Babs and Buster, who were just born toons, were capable of doing it as well.
Extremely early into Looney Tunes' career, Looney Tunes' very own Slyester the Cat breaks the fourth wall here:
() .
He basically explains away what he's doing as 'Anything is possible within a Cartoon' . Now, am I saying this is free reign to say that it can become High 1-A or anything ? Absolutely not (Though I know it can be argued, I'm just not making that argument and I'm definitely not recommending anyone making that argument here unless Looney Tunes pulls some genuinely High 1-A stuff lol). What I am suggesting from this is that Looney Tunes has a built-in explanation and internal logic that they are using to justify why Looney Tunes can do all these crazy feats., including... you guessed it, interacting with their Authors/Animators, even for the Low-Tiers. Normally, we'd have to play a guessing game as to what the internal logic of a verse is, but here it is literally spelled out for you, so there is no guessing game needed.
What I am saying however is that because of Looney Tunes have a built-in explanation as to how the Toons can interact with their Authors/Animators, I do believe R>F Looney Tunes has more merit. The justification for R>F was on the profiles , so it would just require looking into it's history to bring it back up again. Keep in mind this isn't an upgrade, just essentially a thread to clarify that Looney Tunes has a built-in explanation as to why such things are possible within Looney Tunes. IF this is accepted, I'll correlate with others to make such an upgrade thread, considering how R>F Toons is really obvious as even Babs and Buster, who were just born toons, were capable of doing it as well.
