• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Link fights another Devil May Cry Character

Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh I know, I'm just making sure I'm not going crazy by thinking that type 3 Madness resistence (and conversely abilities) shouldn't be given out like that.
 
AogiriKira said:
The real cal howard said:
Also
>Fear

>Triforce of Courage

Instant counter even if Link didn't resist mindhax
Ok so I guess Vegeta should be upgraded to Low 2-C since his an ability called big bang attack.
Vegeta is already Low 2-C owo

Also no offense to Elizhaa but, no
 
Yeah, "but no" doesn't really disprove anything. Also, while it's obviously not the deciding factor, as the one who made the page he'd be one of the more knowledgeable people on the topic.
 
My bad, sorry. I slip up on these things unconsciously. Edited the comment.
 
he does tho
Where is it on his profile? This is a common occurance in Link vs DMC threads I see.

Because Link's page is old while these abilities are new and subsets of stuff Link already has.
 
Question, how good is Link's resistance to RW? since it has an RW with a universal power and range when it is used to the fullest.
 
Oliver de jesus said:
Question, how good is Link's resistance to RW? since it has an RW with a universal power and range when it is used to the fullest.
Since this is full triforce link, I believe it's universal?
 
ZephyrosOmega said:
Oliver de jesus said:
Question, how good is Link's resistance to RW? since it has an RW with a universal power and range when it is used to the fullest.
Since this is full triforce link, I believe it's universal?
Doesn't universal scaling come from the Triforce's AP being superior to Majora?
 
TriforcePower1 said:
Because Link's page is old while these abilities are new and subsets of stuff Link already has.
But why isn't it on Link's profile? A CRT should be made to have them added and TLoZ has had a good amount of revisions recently so I'm surprised it hasn't. Verses threads involving composite Link should be discouraged if his profile isn't up to date.
 
Dienomite22 said:
TriforcePower1 said:
Because Link's page is old while these abilities are new and subsets of stuff Link already has.
But why isn't it on Link's profile? A CRT should be made to have them added and TLoZ has had a good amount of revisions recently so I'm surprised it hasn't. Verses threads involving composite Link should be discouraged if his profile isn't up to date.
I actually do agree that Link needs a lot more resistance than are currently on his profile
 
I don't think everyone here is on the same page about how this works.

A versus thread is not where character statistics are decided. CRT's are. And if a CRT is accepted, it's added to their profile.

You can't argue here that a character does or does not have something and have it actually apply to the match. If you think they do or do not have something, you make a CRT about it.

Versus Matches use what's on the profiles, as that is what has been evaluated and accepted through the process already. If it's not on their profile, then either make a CRT to put it on the profile or else it's not applicable.
 
I myself also see alot of NLF being thrown around.

Such as "NPI negates NEP automatically"

And claims such as Link resisting fear and madness, yet the only mind manip resistance feat he has is resisting mind control.

And also the weird claims of "Link can withstand madness type 3 because he fights eldritch beings like Majora." Thats just... Completely arbitrary and unproven. We go off shown abilities through feats and statements, we can't just assume fighting a weird alien creature autmoatically makes you able to withstand Insanity inducement when no form of insanity inducement has been shown and resisted.
 
Under the current circumstances, this match should be closed.

A CRT can be made to add these kinds of abilities to Link if anyone chooses. I still find them to be very NLF'y and unreliable, but if they are accepted that's none of my business.

But under the current circumstances and abilities, Link can't hurt Mundus and Mundus haxstomps. This should be closed.
 
Alright, here we go with this.

Firstly, what in the makes you think Link's NPI works on Non-Existence? His NPI works on things that don't have a physical form, but still have something like a soul on immaterial form. In short, they still exist to some degree. Mundus, quite literally, does not. Link has never once shown the ability to attack anything at all that just flat out does not exist. NPI can negate Non-Existence if it has the feats to show it, but Link has never done this, at all. This is blatant wank.

And secondly, The Triforce of Courage does not negate madness hax. At most, fear hax, but it has never once been shown to do so. And Link has never once fought eldritch beings, if that even was a point in the first place. The closest is Nightmare and Majora, but neither of those have Madness Hax or Fear Hax, at all. Resisting Mind Control does not mean you resist these either.

Not that fighting an "Eldritch Being" is a point in any way, shape, or form. Being called something doesn't mean you suddenly have abilities that other things called that have. It's why we don't scale Azathoth (Cthulhu Saves The World) to Azathoth (Cthulhu Mythos). They are not the same characters, they have not shown the same feats, so we do not scale them. If being called "Eldritch" gave you madness and fear hax automatically, then we'd be no better than wikis that rate Sonic as outerversal for a single statement about Polaris being a "super dimensional being".

In short, stop wanking Link.
 
"In short stop wanking Link"

Rich coming from the verse that relies on secondary canon unsupported by the games proper. At least everything im saying comes from the primary canon.

Don't get confrontational.
 
"Secondary canon"

The novels have been debated and confirmed to be canon literally countless times.
 
The real cal howard said:
"In short stop wanking Link"
Rich coming from the verse that relies on secondary canon unsupported by the games proper. At least everything im saying comes from the primary canon.

Don't get confrontational.
Says the one who got his verse upgraded to 3-A off of one feat that wasn't even in game but a guidebook statement. Also being passive aggressive the entire thread.
 
No. You don't get to take the high ground. You came out with accusations, not me. Up until then I was being respectful throughout the entire match, and every time I thought of making a snarky comment I edited it to remove all traces of it. You're just as guilty as me here.
 
Look I'll apologize for getting uppity and accusatory about you saying I was wanking. We're both adults and have more important things to worry about. We cool?
 
Passive Agressiveness is not respectful, btw. At most, I was being blunt and calling you out. Now I'm just memeing because I'm fully done with this.

Calling me taking apart your argument in a blunt manner "confrontational" is not a point. You are blatantly wanking.
 
I said it before, and I'll say it again; under the current conditions, this should be closed.
 
The real cal howard said:
Look I'll apologize for getting uppity and accusatory about you saying I was wanking. We're both adults and have more important things to worry about. We cool?
I outright apologized. We're going to be bigger men because this is a video game thread, right? Because we have lives and cares way beyond a simple matter of DMC vs TLOZ, right?
 
The real cal howard said:
The real cal howard said:
Look I'll apologize for getting uppity and accusatory about you saying I was wanking. We're both adults and have more important things to worry about. We cool?
I outright apologized. We're going to be bigger men because this is a video game thread, right? Because we have lives and cares way beyond a simple matter of DMC vs TLOZ, right?
Saying you apologized and then proceeding to be even more passive aggressive and belittling your opposition like that isn't making your apology sound any more genuine cal.
 
No, Cal, you didn't apologize. You insulted an entire verse and it's supporters because you were called out, then apologized in a way that reduces my entire argument to "stop wanking lol" when it was far more than that. When you are called out, again, for being passive agressive, you act high and mighty and try to establish yourself on a moral high ground.

That's not an apology. Not in any sense of the word.
 
...it just hit me how that came off. In my defense KoS's comment coming in after I gave the apology still proceeding to blast me did influence it.

I have nothing against DMC. Not since Kep and Para saved my ass on a thread and I owed them. And even more so when Glass talked to me about how much he loves the series. The comment was only out of anger, not of anything I believed. Well, maybe I did mean some of it but it wasn't meant to come out ever. And I mean that, not trying to be passive aggressive. And yes, the DMC ratings are far more reliable than the Zelda ratings. So I'd be a massive hypocrite to say otherwise. I looked farther into it and realized that I'd have to be a total no-life to continuing arguing over something so petty and meaningless. It's a versus match. How much influence does this have over at most a day? No use angering people I'll never meet for something so small, especially given we could easily be friends without the animosity. With the adrenaline having diminished, I see that the entire ordeal is embarrassing on my part, and worst part is it's not the only time. Heck, I was gonna throw Mundus against Vecna out of spite to see if you guys would argue there before I calmed down. Which is stupid and unfortunately in character of me when I feel spiteful. And that's something I need to work on. The entire ordeal was unnecessary and shows how much my anger can make things take a turn for the worse.

That's my honest apology. So I ask again, as earnestly as I can, we cool?
 
I appreciate that, but it wasn't. I was being a dick, plain and simple. I sure as hell wouldn't have said that to Kep or Paradox. No reason I should talk like that to you guys.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top