Limbo vs GER.

[TacticalNuke002]

Not passively, and when did that happen like at all?

Its not passive but Giorno is free to go about his daily life while GER acts as bodyguard. Operator gets stuck in a loop between motivated and unmotivated.

 

[Jimboydejuan12]

What ups voted count?

 

[Firephoenixearl]

Its not passive but Giorno is free to go about his daily life while GER acts as bodyguard. Operator gets stuck in a loop between motivated and unmotivated.

Yes but that argument is flawed by the fact that GER is gonna be thinking/focusing on Limbo. He doesn't know about The Operator. Since he doesn't know about his existence or his actions he can't unmotivate him via 0 reset.

So yes GER can do that, he can motivate/unmotivate the operator. But he won't do so because not only does he not know whether the operator is motivated or unmotivated (whether he's acting or not), but he doesn't even know about the Operator's existence.

 

[TacticalNuke002]

Knowing isn't necessary. Its like saying someone at the edge of the universe is going to throw mindhax at Giorno and GER won't do a thing because it doesn't know. CM zeroing is its job, something it does on a universal scale. Anything within its range being hostile to Giorno gets nulled.

 

[Firephoenixearl]

Knowing isn't necessary. Its like saying someone at the edge of the universe is going to throw mindhax at Giorno and GER won't do a thing because it doesn't know. CM zeroing is its job, something it does on a universal scale. Anything within its range being hostile to Giorno gets nulled.

False equivalency. Mind hax is a present cause with a present effect. It has a visible effect if used on Giorno and therefore GER will null it. The operator time traveling doesn't have such an effect. Nulling the operator's time travel ain't gonna happen cus GER doesn't know he's doing that.

So basically:

- The operator time travels to the past

- GER has no idea the operator did so and therefore is enjoying his cup of coffee.

- The Operator is now in the past and kills Giorno before GER even existed.

- GER and Giorno get paradoxed out of existence. And since GER has never showed any feats of undoing a past event like that or undoing a paradox he can't do anything

 

[Tony_di_bugalu]

So this is a 2v1?

 

[Firephoenixearl]

So this is a 2v1?

Nah. Limbo is just The Operator's puppet so eh. (When Umbra gets a profile then things change, that will be a literal 2v1).

 

[TacticalNuke002]

So basically:

- The operator time travels to the past

- GER has no idea the operator did so and therefore is enjoying his cup of piss.

- The Operator is now in the past and kills Giorno before GER even existed.

- GER and Giorno get paradoxed out of existence. And since GER has never showed any feats of undoing a past event like that or undoing a paradox he can't do anything

Fixed.

What part of "hostile intent" do you not get?

 

[Firephoenixearl]

Diavolo sure didn't get his hostile intent nulled for no apparent reason UNTIL GER decided to do so. He was able to time stop and wasn't nulled before he time stoped, but rather a bunch of seconds after even though it was hostile and affecting Giorno.

So back to my point show me any scan, statement or feat of GER nulling everything in the universe he has no idea about "passively". GER acts according to his knowledge he has no knowledge the Operator is time traveling with hostile intent. So your argument is false until:

A) GER gets knoweldge of the operator and his every action

B) You make GER passive for the entire universe

C) You show feats of GER undoing an action that happened before he even existed.

Unless you can provide some kind of proof for any of the above 3 points, i don't think the argument of "GER nulls" can be accepted.