• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Lifting Strength vs Durability

Messages
443
Reaction score
140
Character A has Building level Attack Potency but Infinite Lifting Strength and attempts to crush or tear apart a Character B, who has Galaxy level durability, can they do that without AP advantage or you need equal or higher AP to crush a more durable character even with infinitely higher lifting strength?
 
Pretty sure who ever has Infinite LS will also have their AP correspond to it unless they're not doing so with their own power.
 
First, it depends on whether the character usually resorts to the use of LS to tear apart or crush a person, and also as mentioned, whether it is through external means like a power or with their own physical strength. If it is with a power, I would say that in most cases it overwhelms with total ease, although this can vary depending on how the power works. However, it seems that the TK of characters like Force users in Star Wars can be used efficiently to bypass conventional durability, as Darth Vader does. On the other hand, if it is through physical strength, I would say it first requires knowing if the use of LS is common for them.
 
Back
Top