Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Uh oh. You might be right!I'm not sure if this is relevant or if I'm too late to discuss but what about characters with no real defined overall size but their body parts are stated to be as large/heavy as x large thing like a toe as large as a mountain, a hand as tall as a building, etc.
But has the characters' general shape been sort of defined?I'm not sure if this is relevant or if I'm too late to discuss but what about characters with no real defined overall size but their body parts are stated to be as large/heavy as x large thing like a toe as large as a mountain, a hand as tall as a building, etc.
Here’s a question I know will cause a riot: why do you keep saying “a normal, human-shaped giant?” I think I speak for everyone when I say that these “normal, human-shaped giants” are rare in fiction.But has the characters' general shape been sort of defined?
This is basically another aspect of giant model - if a normal human-shaped giant has his palm length the same length as a typical US male human height, we get the palm size relative to the human overall height, then the giant's height can be reliably estimated.
(I assume you are talking about book and novel characters, whose descriptions can be super ill-defined.)
That's better.I'm not going to take any sides but a humanoid shaped giant is fairly common, at least humanoid enough where hand measurements based on the human form aren't unreasonable
Either someone nod on my redraft, or edit my redraft accordingly, thanks.Oh no my home desktop broke down and I am not allowed to use my work laptop to do private things...
But never mind I will redraft:
"Lifting Strength could be calculated from size with clearly defined assumptions. While characters have to lift more bodyweight, lifting strength is the weight they can lift in addition to that. Given giant characters more times than not have to push around other giant characters at around their same sizes, it is only reasonable these characters can lift an extra weight equal to their own weight on top of their own weights. Meanwhile, like any other characters, a lifting strength level has to be shown or at least reasonably deduced to be considered valid. Therefore, the character should demonstrate itself to be capable of doing something like a push up (i.e. pushing much of its weight up with just its hands), wrestling with other monsters at around the same size, or flying by wings (or any non-supernatural means of lifting their weight into the air) or other acceptable lifting strength feat to have the lifting strength tiered to the yield of such feat.
If there are evidence the reference figures these giant characters scale up from can lift way more than their own weight (e.g. a centipede can lift up to 15 times its own weight), such consideration should be taken into account."
I am making this change during weekend if no one objects and no one applies such change.
I don't think the last paragraph should stay. Just being a Centipede doesn't mean that a giant would be able to lift 15x it's own weight."Lifting Strength could be calculated from size with clearly defined assumptions. While characters have to lift more bodyweight, lifting strength is the weight they can lift in addition to that. Given giant characters more times than not have to push around other giant characters at around their same sizes, it is only reasonable these characters can lift an extra weight equal to their own weight on top of their own weights. Meanwhile, like any other characters, a lifting strength level has to be shown or at least reasonably deduced to be considered valid. Therefore, the character should demonstrate itself to be capable of doing something like a push up (i.e. pushing much of its weight up with just its hands), wrestling with other monsters at around the same size, or flying by wings (or any non-supernatural means of lifting their weight into the air) or other acceptable lifting strength feat to have the lifting strength tiered to the yield of such feat.
If there are evidence the reference figures these giant characters scale up from can lift way more than their own weight (e.g. a centipede can lift up to 15 times its own weight), such consideration should be taken into account."
My stance, too.I don't think the last paragraph should stay. Just being a Centipede doesn't mean that a giant would be able to lift 15x it's own weight.
The rest seems fine to me now tho.
Amended.Thank you. Should we not also mention push-ups, jumping reasonably high, and strength-demanding acrobatics as examples of demonstrating comparative strength to a gigantic personal body weight?
This looks mostly fine to me now. What do the rest of you think?Okay.
Redraft ver. Boxing Day:
"Lifting Strength could be calculated from size with only clearly defined assumptions. While it is intuitive characters have to lift their own body weight to move around, lifting strength is the weight they can lift in addition to that. Like any other characters, a lifting strength level has to be shown or at least reasonably deduced to be considered valid. Therefore, the character should demonstrate itself to be capable of performing a lifting strength feat to have the lifting strength tiered to the yield of such feat.
It is worth noting meanwhile that there are cases where giant characters have to push around other giant characters or engage in physical brawls with them. In such cases, the masses of the combatants involved can be taken as lifting strength yields. In a similar fashion, a giant character has to be capable of doping quick push-ups, sit-ups or squats; jumping reasonably high, or performing strength-demanding acrobatics to have their own mass being taken as lifting strength.
There are evidences that the reference figures these giant characters scale up from can lift way more than their own weight (e.g. a centipede can lift up to 15 times its own weight). However, it has currently been agreed upon that such consideration should not been taken into account (i.e. characters only get their yields as if they are normal humans) unless there are very strong official statements where knowledgeable staff members give particular exemptions or allowances."
Jumping high….Thank you. Should we not also mention push-ups, jumping reasonably high, and strength-demanding acrobatics as examples of demonstrating comparative strength to a gigantic personal body weight?
Eh, a minor spelling mistake there, it should be "doing" instead of "doping" but otherwise, seems solid.This looks mostly fine to me now. What do the rest of you think?
Question, what if the character in question is bigger than the universe and is also 4-D?I can agree with the current draft now.
At that point, normal 3-D conventions stop applying to characters, so yeah, I think it would apply to Immeasurable LS.Question, what if the character in question is bigger than the universe and is also 4-D?
Would it warrante Immeasurable lifting strength?
Seems fine. Shall we apply that then?Okay.
Redraft ver. Boxing Day:
"Lifting Strength could be calculated from size with only clearly defined assumptions. While it is intuitive characters have to lift their own body weight to move around, lifting strength is the weight they can lift in addition to that. Like any other characters, a lifting strength level has to be shown or at least reasonably deduced to be considered valid. Therefore, the character should demonstrate itself to be capable of performing a lifting strength feat to have the lifting strength tiered to the yield of such feat.
It is worth noting meanwhile that there are cases where giant characters have to push around other giant characters or engage in physical brawls with them. In such cases, the masses of the combatants involved can be taken as lifting strength yields. In a similar fashion, a giant character has to be capable of doping quick push-ups, sit-ups or squats; jumping reasonably high, or performing strength-demanding acrobatics to have their own mass being taken as lifting strength.
There are evidences that the reference figures these giant characters scale up from can lift way more than their own weight (e.g. a centipede can lift up to 15 times its own weight). However, it has currently been agreed upon that such consideration should not been taken into account (i.e. characters only get their yields as if they are normal humans) unless there are very strong official statements where knowledgeable staff members give particular exemptions or allowances."
I have tried to clean up the language flow."Lifting Strength could be calculated from size with only clearly defined assumptions. While it is intuitive that characters have to lift their own body weight to move around, lifting strength is the weight that they can lift in addition to that. Like any other characters, a lifting strength level has to be shown, or at least reasonably deduced, to be considered valid. Therefore, the character should demonstrate itself to be capable of performing a lifting strength feat to have the lifting strength tiered to the yield of the feat in question.
It is worth noting that there are cases where giant characters have to push around other giant characters or engage in physical brawls with them. In such cases, the masses of the combatants involved can be taken as lifting strength yields. In a similar fashion, a giant character has to be capable of doing push-ups, sit-ups or squats; jumping reasonably high, or performing strength-demanding acrobatics to have their own mass being taken as lifting strength.
There is evidence that the reference figures these giant characters scale up from can lift far more than their own weight (e.g. a centipede can lift up to 15 times its own weight). However, it has currently been agreed that such considerations should not been taken into account (i.e. characters only get their yields as if they are normal humans) unless there are very strong official statements, and knowledgeable staff members give particular exemptions or allowances."