- 28
- 6
How this characteristic can be justified? How it's possible to make character, give him characteristics and say "he's beyond duality"? He's clearly not, you just gave him characteristics.
I can still understand that this Jehovah (WoD) is really beyond existence, he is simply indescribable, but even he is called an essence. But for example Yog-Sothoth described as "limitless BEING and self", how he can be nonexistent?
Although the description of Nonexistent physiology on the page is mainly correct (not at all the type 2 which is "precedes or opposes the state of existence on all levels" doesn't fully transcends binary system).
The most suitable for this artistic description would be Schelling's "Grund".
(Example: being has non-being as its antithesis, but Grund has no antithesis, as it neither being nor non-being.)
Or is Nonexistent Physiology given for something less ontological and I think too much about it?
I can still understand that this Jehovah (WoD) is really beyond existence, he is simply indescribable, but even he is called an essence. But for example Yog-Sothoth described as "limitless BEING and self", how he can be nonexistent?
Although the description of Nonexistent physiology on the page is mainly correct (not at all the type 2 which is "precedes or opposes the state of existence on all levels" doesn't fully transcends binary system).
The most suitable for this artistic description would be Schelling's "Grund".
(Example: being has non-being as its antithesis, but Grund has no antithesis, as it neither being nor non-being.)
Or is Nonexistent Physiology given for something less ontological and I think too much about it?
Last edited: