- 4,239
- 4,084
Introduction
No one can debunk Jujutsu Kaisen, with the sole exception of- You thought I was gonna say something that corny huh. Sybau.
I'd like to work on more verses, so, debunk thread for speed I guess.
Please let's keep this civilised. Mask your hate for me in this thread, I'm just trying to help. I'll try to remake the calcs asap.
I'd like to work on more verses, so, debunk thread for speed I guess.
Please let's keep this civilised. Mask your hate for me in this thread, I'm just trying to help. I'll try to remake the calcs asap.
Calculation 1
You can't prove he moved that distance within the timeframe of the explosion moving that far. He could have moved much less. This, very basic debunk, makes the calculation unusable.
Calculation 2
1. The pixel scaling forgets to account for the fact his mouth is open. It also forgets to account for the fact his head is tilted to the side, making the pixel scaling less accurate. I'd use something like his finger length.
2. They use a utility poles diameter? Then use height? Like what? I guess they could be uniform so I'll leave this as a question.
3. The PB (whatever that is), is clearly inconsistent in size, so using it as a point of measure would be incorrect.
4. In one panel your scaling the height of the PB and in the next you're scaling the width of it at an angle. So that's another complete debunk.
I could go on and on, but these basically make the calc unusable. Sorry.
2. They use a utility poles diameter? Then use height? Like what? I guess they could be uniform so I'll leave this as a question.
3. The PB (whatever that is), is clearly inconsistent in size, so using it as a point of measure would be incorrect.
4. In one panel your scaling the height of the PB and in the next you're scaling the width of it at an angle. So that's another complete debunk.
I could go on and on, but these basically make the calc unusable. Sorry.
Calculation 3
Okay so with this angle, the pov is slightly to the left of the feat, making the pixel scaling less reliable if you scale towards the pov. I'd suggest using Iris height. But you can't really scale it here as it's a lot more complex than just using lines, like, in my honest opinion, it looks like a much larger distance than 2cm. My opinion holds valid because the pixel scaling kinda highballs it due to the angles in the feat.
I declare this feat, much more complex than how it's calculated.
I declare this feat, much more complex than how it's calculated.
Calculation 4
I don't get it, it happens in more than 3 panels. Here's the chapter.
The other calcs are alright, albeit, some are actually lowballs, so in my next thread expect a potential upgrade, if I'm correct.
The other calcs are alright, albeit, some are actually lowballs, so in my next thread expect a potential upgrade, if I'm correct.