• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Journey to the West | Sun Wukong & Buddhism Physiology Additions & Changes

Status
Not open for further replies.
4,456
3,006
Introduction


This CRT is focused on adding and changing things to both the Sun Wukong Profile, alongside the Buddhism Physiology Profile. Some of these things are simply changes including new reasonings for certain abilities since a lot of abilities and their requirements have shifted compared to before. On top of this, a few repeating abilities or abilities that simply have no weight in their scans will be directly removed. So let's get into it.

Buddhism Physiology


Transcendent Monks
Bodhisattvas
Buddhas
Dharmakaya

Sun Wukong Profile


AP
Durability
Speed
Abilities
 
Last edited:
I agree of course.

Though, i have one question, are you going to make a profiles for other characters like demons and Buddhas?
 
Well, he's not as big as the Low 1-C Realm. Like filling the physical space of an infinite universe is High 3-A, since you're not reaching the temporal dimension of it.
But it's not the same in Tier 1.

You don't need to be as large as a Low 1-C universe to be Low 1-C, all you need is qualitative superiority over the Tier 2 cosmology. This is why simply having R>F over a Low 2-C world is Low 1-C, as despite you're "human sized" in that Low 1-C world, you have still some degree of Tier 1 power, hence why these characters are not 2-A but just Low 1-C.
 
But it's not the same in Tier 1.

You don't need to be as large as a Low 1-C universe to be Low 1-C, all you need is qualitative superiority over the Tier 2 cosmology. This is why simply having R>F over a Low 2-C world is Low 1-C, as despite you're "human sized" in that Low 1-C world, you have still some degree of Tier 1 power, hence why these characters are not 2-A but just Low 1-C.
Oh, I see, gotcha.
 
Is there any reason why you didn't include Tathagata's statement saying sun can move planets and stars for LS?
 
Issue is that it must absolutely overpower their weight at very least, otherwise it never happened.
True, but he could move them through size change like he does to the moon, which can already give him Immeasurable. He could have done it through magic, which then raises the question of whether it was telekinesis or some weird spell that only affects celestial bodies, just like his spell that lets him flip SPECIFICALLY seas and oceans. He could also do it through sheer force by hitting it, which would fall into AP.

All we know is he can move them.
 
Yeah this all looks fine to me.

I'm unsure if you need the Acausality 5 reviewed, though.

But since it mentions causality directly, and those who are non-casual are inferred to not change or grow as a result (as well as not being born, not being able to die, and etc) it should be fine.
 
Yeah this all looks fine to me.

I'm unsure if you need the Acausality 5 reviewed, though.

But since it mentions causality directly, and those who are non-casual are inferred to not change or grow as a result, it should be fine.
Theglassman12 already reviewed it in another thread.
 
Seems like just contain "A and B is neither true nor false".
Type 3 comes from the last one, given that craving is neither giving nor taking.

Thus it fits the Type 3 requirement for:
  • Not giving (1)
  • Not taking (0)
  • Craving (neither 1 nor 0)
  • Not craving (it can't be described even with neither 1 nor 0)
Thus it's Type 3 as it can't be described with neither 1, nor 0, nor a state which is outside both.
 
Is is neither the same nor different than anything in the verse, including duality and non-duality.
Yes, but it still doesn't include other 3 combinations of true and false
Type 3 comes from the last one, given that craving is neither giving nor taking.

Thus it fits the Type 3 requirement for:
  • Not giving (1)
  • Not taking (0)
  • Craving (neither 1 nor 0)
  • Not craving (neither the fact it can't be described with neither 1 nor 0)
Thus it's Type 3 as it can't be described with neither 1, nor 0, nor a state which is outside both.
All right, that's good.
But Where is both 1 and 0 true?
Because page says "and not be in any of the 4 combinations of true and false mentioned earlier."
So both 1 and 0 needed.
 
Type 3 comes from the last one, given that craving is neither giving nor taking.

Thus it fits the Type 3 requirement for:
  • Not giving (1)
  • Not taking (0)
  • Craving (neither 1 nor 0)
  • Not craving (it can't be described even with neither 1 nor 0)
Thus it's Type 3 as it can't be described with neither 1, nor 0, nor a state which is outside both.
But as far as I know, Type 3 required five different conditions.

That is, there will be 4 different situations and you will be in the "5th" situation which is outside of these 4 different situations but at the same time inside of these 4 different situations
 
Stop complicating transduality type 3.
It's just not being 1 nor 0 which is what Dharmakaya is.
 
Stop complicating transduality type 3.
It's just not being 1 nor 0 which is what Dharmakaya is.
And this is not enough
We do not complicate it, we only say that the truth states written in the op is not enough.
 
Last edited:
Stop complicating transduality type 3.
It's just not being 1 nor 0 which is what Dharmakaya is.
You're misinterpreting Type 3 man. Even a simple transduality has it. Well "not being 1 nor 0 " This looks more like the NEP that comes with TD.
 
And this is not enough
We do not complicate it, we only say that written in the op truth states are not enough.
Heaven and the earth where already stated to contain yin and yang (all dualities). Then the Realm of Ultimate Bliss is stated outright to be non dual realm (transduality type 2) Dharmakaya is then stated to have no coming nor leaving, no contrast nor sameness, no being nor nonbeing, no giving, no taking nor any hopeful craving. Even Transended Monks have Transduality type 2 which are then R>F Transended by Buddhisattvas which then in turn are also R>F Transended by Buddhas which are then Transended by Dharmakaya.
 
Yes, but it still doesn't include other 3 combinations of true and false
The Yin & Yang is Duality, meaning both 1 and 0. (1 Truth State, equivalent to saying something is both existent and non-existent)

Transcendent Monks exist within a state of Non-Duality, meaning they are either 1 or 0. (2 Truth States, equivalent to saying something is either existent or non-existent, never both.)

Buddha exists in a state where dualities, in general, do not exist, meaning they are neither 1 nor 0. (1 Truth States, equivalent to saying something is neither existent nor non-existent)

Dharmakaya exists in a state where it has no contrast nor sameness from everything else, meaning they are not 1, nor are they 0, they are not 1 and 0, they are also neither 1 nor 0. (1 Truth State, equivalent to saying something is not both existent and non-existent, it's also not either existent or non-existent, it's also neither existent nor non-existent, it is something else entirely.)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top