Yea surely no one can beat Goku, not even if Isis froze time, space, and shattered him into nothingness
For a serious answer though, speed equalized, I think the 6 Kings at least stalemate if not win.Hopefully nobody does that match up after all the upgrades go through
If Battler stays in High 1-A
I was holding back on the calc when some resulted in 5-B planet tier.
Idk about that chief. Reflecting back 5x the power of Garou's attacks sounds like it's in oneshot range. Subjective Reality renders all his attacks nonexistent. Casuality manip makes every attack miss too. Time Stop, Low-Godly regen, possibly Mid-Godly.
normal peak stuff in true harem. It’s one of the reasons I love them so much. The different personalities of the girls around the MC are always fun to watch and really interesting.
You won’t regret it. It’s peak. And it has a specific reading order, every side story, even the movie, is canon and important to the main plot. So if you’re planning to read it, ask me for the order. Just like Isekai at Peace, it introduces a lot of characters in those side stories who later show up in the main story.
You’re welcome. As for the Arata thing, I was actually going to give all the current characters with pages 1A AP, including Arata. But I got outvoted by the othe supporters, who care more about fixing the profiles and adding more abilities before giving them 1A AP.
Does she has layers to her plot EE?
that'll imply that there is someone who can resist Epilogue, so no
Makes no sense because someone "being immune to Epilogue but still dying" is straight up a layer into plot manip
handy dandy resistance negation says hi
That's the thing, it makes no sense to be a "resistance negation", she isn't negating the resistance, she's killing it even WITH that resistance/immunity. That's straight up higher potency. (or well, in terms of layers I mean)
I don't know what you mean by this?
Nah, you don't need that much. You can still be baseline High 1-A but have multiple layers.
I know you can have multilayered abilities at baseline but I'm talking about the working of Epilogue, like it sees everything as fiction, and a paper in a book and closes the book itself. A being who can block the Epilogue means they can block the book from being closed, shouldn't that itself put them at H1-A? And Epilogue will close the book anyway, so a layer above baseline H1-A... that's complicated tbh....this thing interacting with the tiering system I mean...
It could just be a layer into the hierarchy of High 1-A, but not a layer of High 1-A tbf. But even then, I think it's too big of an assumption and would just see it as "someone with plot manip that can resist Epilogue EE" to avoid weird stuff
The layer above baseline H1-A comes from Epilogue seeing that H1-A being as fiction aswell. The being can block his book being closed and Epilogue would see that being as fiction as well, so 1 layer above baseline H1-A. I'm not too sure tbh, dealing with Epilogue is too complex cuz of how it works, you pretty much can't resist it cuz of it's existence. I don't think anyone can resist anything from an R>F transcendence gap..... dealing with Epilogue is hard...it closes the book so you can't resist it, to resist it you need to stop the book from being closed, basically H1-A.....
Ehhh, I don't see it like this personally. Clearly you can forget the "AP" side of that shit. In any case, such a thing wouldn't pass on a CRT because it would lead to a circular argument that ends up at the theoretical maximum of High 1-A.
This is not resistance negation. Nowhere in the text does it say it "negate the resistance", it bypass it due to a layer. The "blocking part" is a bit ambiguous, I heard from Legacy it's meant as "someone who can counter it", so I guess both goes to the same direction, technically. Although "countering" is very vague.
Blocking the epilogue is probably just countering with an ability. Like for example if kuro made a possibility of "blocking" the epilogue somehow with the prologue, for her to control the story, epilogue would still work. So I think that part implies a layer
