Is this Acausality?

[Arthex]

"I am myself because of the events that lead upto making me what I am today. Each event had a different outcome and each outcome lead upto 1000 different events, in the end if the principle of "me" was changed in the past, the principle of me wouldn't exist in the present. If I change my principle of the past, the current me would simply never exist and thus no one ever changed my principle in the past."

"<Watir, Stone Of Destiny> However makes one's principle be unbound by any changes in the past, present and future. I will be "me", because I desire to be me. I could explore All those endless possibilities in a second and yet my principle would be completely unaffected.

To put it in simple, the very concept of cause and effect would no longer apply to me."

is this Acausality? If yes, which type.

 

[LordGinSama]

Hmm type 5 I believe.

 

[ActuallySpaceMan42]

If taken literally I suppose it's Acuasality Type 5.

 

[Arthex]

I thought Acausality type 5 requires you to be outside the system or something

 

[Arthex]

Oh and btw is forcing someone who is Acausality type 5 to a another system the character has created Acausality Negation? ( like lets say I trascend system 1, but someone forces me to follow the system 2 and its stuff )

 

[LordGinSama]

I thought Acausality type 5 requires you to be outside the system or something

The system is Cause and Effect itself. So if the statement is legitimate then yeah, type 5.

 

[ActuallySpaceMan42]

Oh and btw is forcing someone who is Acausality type 5 to a another system the character has created Acausality Negation? ( like lets say I trascend system 1, but someone forces me to follow the system 2 and its stuff )

Acausality Type 5 doesn't follow any system whether it be 1, 2, or 3 so they would be forcing an Acausality Character to be Acausality Type 4 instead of 5.

 

[Alexander]

transcend cause and effect what is it?

 

[Vietthai96]

This shit require more feat and context to be Acausal 5, default assumption is either type 2 or 4.
However the line is so cringe for me, let me guess another Chinese verse??

 

[LordGinSama]

This shit require more feat and context to be Acausal 5, default assumption is either type 2 or 4.
However the line is so cringe for me, let me guess another Chinese verse??

LMFAO

 

[Setsuna_tenma]

This shit require more feat and context to be Acausal 5, default assumption is either type 2 or 4.
However the line is so cringe for me, let me guess another Chinese verse??

nah its probably one of those cringe webnovels.

 

[LIFE_OF_KING]

On the topic of "Is this Acausality?"

Would existing and governing in a place where aspects of the past, present, and future coexist be something?

 

[DaimaouAshura]

This shit require more feat and context to be Acausal 5, default assumption is either type 2 or 4.
However the line is so cringe for me, let me guess another Chinese verse??

ROFL

 

[Iamunanimousinthat]

That honestly sounds like Type 1. They're saying changing the past or future won't change who they are.

 

[Fixxed]

That is acausality type 1 + acausality type 4.

 

[TauanVictor]

That is Acausality Type 1 + Acausality Type 4 + Acausality Type 5

 

[Vietthai96]

That is Acausality Type 1 + Acausality Type 4 + Acausality Type 5

Huh, wtf, you can't have Acausality 1 + 4 + 5. Type 5 is completely devoid of cause and effect thus you can't have other type because from type 1 to 4 there is still cause and effect on them

 

[DaimaouAshura]

The statement is grounds to support acausality but we'd need to see what the character does with it to decide on the type

 

[Arthex]

This shit require more feat and context to be Acausal 5, default assumption is either type 2 or 4.
However the line is so cringe for me, let me guess another Chinese verse??

Correct...... its one of those cultivation novels.

 

[Arthex]

dont blame me kek, I love the cultivation genre but there are only few good animes about it so I gotta resort to the novels and ahem lets just say not all novels are good..

 

[kuramamyfav68]

Imo there's nothing supporting type 5. This sounds more like type 1 or something.