• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Infinite 4-D power = Infinite 5-D power = High 2-A???

Status
Not open for further replies.
For the guy editing the Spectre, take out the fact that he was badly outmatched by the five dimensional imps repeatedly. It's fairly obvious anyway.
 
I think that one mention about it should stay.
 
@TLT1 The mention that the 5-D imps repeatedly badly outmatched the Spectre.
 
We don't have any High 2-B.So, the High part should be gone.I can't say anything more as I don't know about the character.
 
Fodderising somebody with 10^100 times universal power, as I think Mobster Kingpin did, is not anywhere near enough to qualify for "At least 2-B" or even "High 2-B"
 
Antvasima said:
Fodderising somebody with 10^100 times universal power, as I think Mobster Kingpin did, is not anywhere near enough to qualify for "At least 2-B" or even "High 2-B"
That was Black Hole Mobster Kingpin. Problem Sleuth fodderised Demonhead Mobster Kingpin, who absorbed Black Hole Mobster Kingpin (who he was already vastly stronger than) and multiplied his power by an untold amount.
 
For the first one, Tribunal? That one was done by Darkness552 (AFAIK). I'm not sure what to make up of it since the recent changes for the 2-A tiers + Darkness is not around to help modify it or whatever....
 
Yeah that sounds more like a 2-A feat. Going by the image link that explains Sigma's tier, i don't get the implication that he became High 2-A.
 
Well, except that certain profiles now have too much bolded text, I suppose so.
 
Antvasima said:
Well, except that certain profiles now have too much bolded text, I suppose so.
the text can be fixed in regular edits

but, there is one profile left: Y'ffre- which is listed as 2-B, possibly 2-A, while his DC is at Multiversal+ and I am unsure about what to do
 
Well, if it contains half of the timelines within itself, and there are an infinite number of timelines, I suppose that 2-A seems appropriate.
 
What if a character was able to create/destroy a universe that contains an infinite amount of space and time? Would that be low 2-C or 2-A on the basis of having infinite 4-D power? Also, wouldn't multiversal branches exist in 5-D space?
 
We tend to avoid hypothetical situations, and deal with what has actually been presented within various fictions, but you can ask DarkLK about the infinite 4-D example.

As for multiversal branches, as far as I understand, yes the 4-D continuums are aligned with each other along a 5-Dimensional axis, but only an unfathomably narrow one would be required. Hence, we rate proper 5-D characters higher.
 
Sorry for posting on this again but don't a lot of fictional universes have infinite time? There are probably dozens of stories where the heat death of the universe happens, it would take infinite time for the universe to reach absolute zero temperature. What about universes where time is finite, does that mean destroying 10 quadrillion years worth of spacetime is equivalent to 10 trillion years?

Also, if you think this is too arbitrary, you've accepted the speculation that there are 10^500 universes AND that there are 10-11 dimensions in a standard multiverse, things that are only in string theory, while the heat death of the universe is a very likely event, being the most accepted possible end of the universe by science because of observations pointing to a topologically flat, zero-energy universe. Destroying our timeline in real life would likely destroy an infinite amount of time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top