• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Inclusion/Notability of Verses in VsBattle Wiki (Staff Only)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Okay. Can you link to what your new intended structure will look like please?

Keep this in mind though:
Initially, we found an issue with awkward spacing under headers due to the "Edit Section" feature, so I considered using a magic word for such issue, but it has been determined by Dread that it will only be noticeable to those with editing access.
 
Hmm. I think that we should avoid formatting with complicated source code whenever possible. It seems better to stick closer to our standard formatting.
 
Hmm. I think that we should avoid formatting with complicated source code whenever possible. It seems better to stick closer to our standard formatting.
I was unaware of the message suggesting to avoid using complex source code when formatting, but it seems that my actions unknowingly and conveniently coincided with the recommendation. My previous formatting attempts proved to be too convoluted for my taste, so I took the opportunity to simplify things by rewriting my previous formatting changes and removing the unnecessary <big> tags that were made in the rules organization thread, and replacing them with a format that is in line with our established standards.
 
Last edited:
I am personally fine with that, but let's first wait a while to see if anybody here has something important to add.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top