In Matter manipulation which is smallest and how big or small is quantum?

[Dunno6988]

Since scp 682 has matter maipulation but on qauntum level, but it doesn't specify how small each are and how small is qunatum and google was no good either.

 

[FanofRPGs]

(We need revisions on this)

Matter Manipulation goes like this:

Molecular Manipulation: The ability to manipulate covalent and ionic molecules

Atomic Manipulation: The ability to manipulate individual atoms, ions, and isotopes

Sub-Atomic Manipulation: The ability to manipulate protons, neutrons, and maybe electrons

Macro-Quantum Manipulation: The ability to manipulate quarks and bosons (Gluons, Photons, Higgs Bosons, etc.). Also the ability to mess with stuff like electron arrangement and spin

Quantum Manipulation: The ability to manipulate quantum strings and foam and mess with the very fundamental space-time packets that form out universe

 

[WeeklyBattles]

Pretty much what Fan said

Also i wouldnt mind adding that list, it would be quite useful and helpful in understanding different levels of matter manipulation

 

[Assaltwaffle]

Quantum is pretty freaking ridiculous. There isn't much you can't do with that power.

 

[Dunno6988]

so quantum is the smallest then, huh?

 

[Fllflourine]

Pretty much Fans scale up there.

 

[ProspectX]

(We need revisions on this)
Matter Manipulation goes like this:

Molecular Manipulation: The ability to manipulate covalent and ionic molecules

Atomic Manipulation: The ability to manipulate individual atoms, ions, and isotopes

Sub-Atomic Manipulation: The ability to manipulate protons, neutrons, and maybe electrons

Macro-Quantum Manipulation: The ability to manipulate quarks and bosons (Gluons, Photons, Higgs Bosons, etc.). Also the ability to mess with stuff like electron arrangement and spin

Quantum Manipulation: The ability to manipulate quantum strings and foam and mess with the very fundamental space-time packets that form out universe

This should be edited to the page, it's very important.

 

[Fllflourine]

I agree with ProspectX

 

[Assaltwaffle]

If it isn't already there I agree as well. Perhaps this needs to be treated like Immortality, in which you must list what type they possess in-profile. The difference between manipulating matter on a large scale and manipulating quantum foam is astronomical.

 

[Saikou_The_Lewd_King]

Trying to change all of our profiles with matter manip would take way too much effort.

 

[ZacharyGrossman273]

At once.

 

[The_Everlasting]

Quantum is pretty freaking ridiculous. There isn't much you can't do with that power.

You should see Ben 10. It has a weapon that can erase matter on a sub-quantum level.

 

[Assaltwaffle]

Isn't that just Void Manipulation at that point?

 

[Matthew_Schroeder]

Agreed. There is no need to start a mass revision to alter profiles from Matter Manipulation to those sub-categories. They are all simply levels / sub-divisions of Matter Manipulation.

Though you could improve the Matter Manipulation page.

 

[Fllflourine]

The time to take to re-adjust all the matter manipulators to that list would be tedious and long, yes, but I would still say that the page itself can be expanded upon, with examples provided.

 

[ProspectX]

That would certainly be a immense list, better to just change the page.

 

[Fllflourine]

So, anyone else's thoughts on whether or not I should add Fan's suggestion to the Matter Manipulation page? I'll reiterate that it won't change any profiles of matter users; the most work we'll do with this is finding examples for each of them.

 

[ProspectX]

If you add it, it be a far more accurate depiction of matter manipulation. Also check this [[1]]thread

 

[Fllflourine]

No can do on the thread, sorry, I'm currently busy on other things (such as trying to get to 10k); and it seems you've already got people covered

 

[Fllflourine]

I have created a blog for the proposed new scale, with much help from Fan.

 

[ProspectX]

Not a must, of course. I thought the manga i linked on the thread might deserve a bit more recognition, i'm trying to decipher if that statement could contemplate physics manipulation or matter manipulation, or both. Actually, it would be precise to regard it as information manipulation. More generally that is.