• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

How to create High 1-B/1-A/High 1-A/0 structures?

Ah, now I understand a bit better.
R>F works for the creation of 1-A structures (that would be Meta-Transcendence), but High 1-A structures are created differently. An R>F transcendence doesn't work; we have to look for something different (which would be Meta-Meta-Transcendence).

So, what would this Meta-Meta-Transcendence be like? When I read Umineko's cosmology and the Cthulhu Mythos, it was mentioned that High 1-A spaces functioned differently from their 1-A structures, like they have something different, something thar 1-A structures dont have.

So, this Meta-Meta-Transcendence would mean that these structures are not only infinitely larger than 1-A structures—even if the latter were infinite, they wouldn't reach them—but that they operate with different laws/concepts, right?
With 1-A and High 1-A its frameworks. It's them having a superior framework compared to those 1-A spaces. Them having different laws is just part of that overall framework difference.
 
With 1-A and High 1-A its frameworks. It's them having a superior framework compared to those 1-A spaces. Them having different laws is just part of that overall framework difference.
So, High 1-A structures have these characteristics:

  • They are infinitely superior to a 1-A structure.
  • They operate with different laws/concepts than a 1-A structure.

What else is needed? What other tests are required for a structure to be considered a High 1-A structure?
Thank you in advance for your answers and your patience.
 
So, High 1-A structures have these characteristics:

  • They are infinitely superior to a 1-A structure.
  • They operate with different laws/concepts than a 1-A structure.
erm, about the first one, h1-A structures are superior to an infinite amount of 1A structures, not infinitely superior to a single 1A structure, those are 2 different things
 
So, High 1-A structures have these characteristics:

  • They are infinitely superior to a 1-A structure.
  • They operate with different laws/concepts than a 1-A structure.

What else is needed? What other tests are required for a structure to be considered a High 1-A structure?
Thank you in advance for your answers and your patience.
A transcendence is just surpassing some boundary. High 1-A surpasses the transcendence 1-A already performs on the properties that define its domain, like space and time.

Think of it like this, for 1-A, the boundary it surpasses is usually all possible dimensional spaces and cardinalities as that would encompass all movements on the framework of space and time. This is a baseline because for most verses, space and time are pretty much standard governing forces that tell you how one exists in the main setting. The entire tiering system from 11-C to Low 1-A can be defined as a difference in extents of space and time. So the transcendences are denoted as all quantitative because they fall under only increasing your dimensionality, which is category for all degrees those tiers operate on.

However, a R>F transcendence is more so qualitative, so it goes beyond the quality of what defines the tiers from 11-C to Low 1-A. The reason an R>F transcendence is a representation of this is because it dissolves the actuality of a lower reality. So if space and time are properties shown in a given realm, an R>F transcendence to that realm dissolve those properties entirely. It essentially reduces the whole framework the lower reality operates on(space and time) to non-existence relative to itself, which is still actual. This makes the higher reality actual in a way that’s distinct and outside of space and time, otherwise it wouldn’t dissolve the actuality of that domain in the first place, thus 1-A. And further levels into 1-A are basically just a further movement out into that higher mode of being.

With High 1-A, meta qualitative transcendence can be thought of as surpassing qualities rather than just a further movement through a single higher qualitative existence like with 1-A. So it takes what was one big jump through a whole framework, and turns that into individual layers. And those layers go on with no real end as you can keep stacking qualitative frameworks.
 
Last edited:
erm, about the first one, h1-A structures are superior to an infinite amount of 1A structures, not infinitely superior to a single 1A structure, those are 2 different things
So, it wouldn't be that it infinitely transcends a 1-A structure, but rather an uncountable number of infinities of that 1-A structure.
 
A transcendence is just surpassing some boundary. High 1-A surpasses the transcendence 1-A already performs on the properties that define its domain, like space and time.

Think of it like this, for 1-A, the boundary it surpasses is usually all possible dimensional spaces and cardinalities as that would encompass all movements on the framework of space and time. This is a baseline because for most verses, space and time are pretty much standard governing forces that tell you how one exists in the main setting. The entire tiering system from 11-C to Low 1-A can be defined as a difference in extents of space and time. So the transcendences are denoted as all quantitative because they fall under only increasing your dimensionality, which is category for all degrees those tiers operate on.

However, a R>F transcendence is more so qualitative, so it goes beyond the quality of what defines the tiers from 11-C to Low 1-A. The reason an R>F transcendence is a representation of this is because it dissolves the actuality of a lower reality. So if space and time are properties shown in a given realm, an R>F transcendence to that realm dissolve those properties entirely. It essentially reduces the whole framework the lower reality operates on(space and time) to non-existence relative to itself, which is still actual. This makes the higher reality actual in a way that’s distinct and outside of space and time, otherwise it wouldn’t dissolve the actuality of that domain in the first place, thus 1-A. And further levels into 1-A are basically just a further movement out into that higher mode of being.

With High 1-A, meta qualitative transcendence can be thought of as surpassing qualities rather than just a further movement through a single higher qualitative existence like with 1-A. So it takes what was one big jump through a whole framework, and turns that into individual layers. And those layers go on with no real end as you can keep stacking qualitative frameworks.
A 1-A structure operates differently from dimensions with space and time; these concepts are transcended.
Therefore, a High 1-A structure would operate differently from a 1-A structure that exists beyond the concepts of time and space.

But what other elements would demonstrate the existence of a High 1-A structure?
 
Bump

What other elements would demonstrate the existence of a High 1-A structure?

Furthermore:
  • It operates within a systematic and conceptual framework with laws that extend beyond those existing in a 1-A structure.
  • This structure is infinitely larger than an infinite number of 1-A structures.
 
Bump

What other elements would demonstrate the existence of a High 1-A structure?

Furthermore:
  • It operates within a systematic and conceptual framework with laws that extend beyond those existing in a 1-A structure.
  • This structure is infinitely larger than an infinite number of 1-A structures.
the structure being infinitely larger is a disqualifer. it needs to have qualitative superiority
 
But, it was said that a structure has to be larger than infinitely many 1-A structures, so that doesn't count?
It needs to be qualitatively "larger" than an infinite hierarchy of 1-A structures. a qualitative gap cannot be infinite or any subdivision of infinity
 
Back
Top