Digital_Franz
He/Him- 1,902
- 1,023
I have been planning this downgrade for a long time.
The 2-A rating of the cosmology was accepted in this thread, a thread where we were all fooled by this sandbox that we didn't read, especially the scans.
Well, it's all well and good that I say we were fooled, now we have to prove it. First I agreed with the thread to upgrade cosmology without reading the blog, just because the OP mentioned infinite possibilities and was trying to argue Low 1-C, which was my main point of contention, neglecting the rest. So cosmology is 2-A using the Many-World Interpretation argument and infinite possibilities.
There are issues with the infinite possibilities stuff:
The second scan is the same scan, nothing more.
The third scan is just as fun. The scan talks about match formation and possibilities and it's used for scaling, lol.
The fourth scan. He talks about the power of the breasts that can give him random powerups, hinting at possibilities, here nothing material and usable for scaling.
The fifth scan. So peak this scan. Literally, nothing usable here. It mentions possibilities that "can occur" following the throwing of a rock. It's such a basic thing. With a soccer ball coming towards us, we have several possibilities, I don't see anything here that can be added for scaling. If you open this link again, you will see that the one who published the scan is trying to justify something. What he says there unfortunately comes purely from his own invention, nothing mentioning the creation of anything.
The sixth scan. This one is so funny. It just refers to the potential of the young people whose training is taken care of by a certain character, nothing more.
The seventh scan. Not only is it vague, but the context here refers to the future, mentioning the fact that there are an infinite number of possibilities open to a person.
All this comes from a misuse of possibilities. Possibilities do not exist, they can occur.
The justification of these guys is the most absurd thing ever. The justification is here. So absurd, so wrong. So the scan they used talks about timelines splitting when the past is changed, which is absolutely not consistent with the Many-Worlds Interpretation theory. The timeline splits here only happen when the past is changed, while the Many-Worlds Interpretation wants at least these splits to be made to accommodate all possibilities of an action in the present. Moreover, to their justification, they add their own deductions and personal thoughts like "the future is infinite so there are infinitely many timelines created" lol.
It's simple here: the verse does not follow the Many-Worlds Interpretation theory.
With all this said, one thing is clear: the cosmology is not 2-A and should be downgraded to 2-C.
The 2-A rating of the cosmology was accepted in this thread, a thread where we were all fooled by this sandbox that we didn't read, especially the scans.
Well, it's all well and good that I say we were fooled, now we have to prove it. First I agreed with the thread to upgrade cosmology without reading the blog, just because the OP mentioned infinite possibilities and was trying to argue Low 1-C, which was my main point of contention, neglecting the rest. So cosmology is 2-A using the Many-World Interpretation argument and infinite possibilities.
Infinite Possibilities
There are issues with the infinite possibilities stuff:
- Scans and their contexts in this link.
The second scan is the same scan, nothing more.
The third scan is just as fun. The scan talks about match formation and possibilities and it's used for scaling, lol.
The fourth scan. He talks about the power of the breasts that can give him random powerups, hinting at possibilities, here nothing material and usable for scaling.
The fifth scan. So peak this scan. Literally, nothing usable here. It mentions possibilities that "can occur" following the throwing of a rock. It's such a basic thing. With a soccer ball coming towards us, we have several possibilities, I don't see anything here that can be added for scaling. If you open this link again, you will see that the one who published the scan is trying to justify something. What he says there unfortunately comes purely from his own invention, nothing mentioning the creation of anything.
The sixth scan. This one is so funny. It just refers to the potential of the young people whose training is taken care of by a certain character, nothing more.
The seventh scan. Not only is it vague, but the context here refers to the future, mentioning the fact that there are an infinite number of possibilities open to a person.
All this comes from a misuse of possibilities. Possibilities do not exist, they can occur.
- Misleading interpretation of scans.
Many-Worlds Interpretation
The justification of these guys is the most absurd thing ever. The justification is here. So absurd, so wrong. So the scan they used talks about timelines splitting when the past is changed, which is absolutely not consistent with the Many-Worlds Interpretation theory. The timeline splits here only happen when the past is changed, while the Many-Worlds Interpretation wants at least these splits to be made to accommodate all possibilities of an action in the present. Moreover, to their justification, they add their own deductions and personal thoughts like "the future is infinite so there are infinitely many timelines created" lol.
It's simple here: the verse does not follow the Many-Worlds Interpretation theory.
With all this said, one thing is clear: the cosmology is not 2-A and should be downgraded to 2-C.