• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Hazbin Hotel Discussion Thread

Argue with the one who put that ability on his profile then. Who is known as @ShionAH
I'm not really arguing for anything specific. All I'm saying is Lucifer's power has shown to negate regeneration, so using Emily to prove Angels don't have regeneration doesn't really work in my opinion.

The Lute exemple is still valid.
 
Your logic is "higher end angel=better shit", tell me Shion, who is a higher end Angel than Adam? A Seraphim.
Well Emily is clearly not above Adam in power, he is built different you can cry all you want.
S1E7 makes no sense with this explanation either, Shion. Adam was no the one doing all of the extermination stuff. He had an army at his back. Or did you forget?
Oh yes I forgot that Adam has an army, you are SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO smart actualyl WOWWWWW wow!!!! WOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
And you're using an episode that is Referring to ALL ANGELS SINNERS INTERACT WITH, aka EXCORCISTS to try and prove your point, Shion.
And YOU'RE NOT using an episode that's ENTIRE PLOT LINE is that Angels are HARD TO KILL. Yet by your logic all they have is.... oh yeah... NOTHING. Wow, I guess Vaggie just has the ability to heal only for her wings, sure! Wow!!!!!!! Guys Angels have EXTREMELY HIGH durability, remember when they uhhh.... uhh yeah.... they

GUYS ANGELS ARE SO DURABLE CANNIBALS CAN DIG THEIR TEETH INTO THEM WITH NO PROBLEM, CANNIBAL TEETH HAVE TOP TIER AP FOR HELL? WOW

 
I don't really care if that ability is valid or not. All I'm saying is Lucifer's power has shown to negate regeneration, so using Emily to prove Angels don't have regeneration doesn't really work in my opinion.

The Lute exemple is still valid.
Or, alternatively, their Regeneration does not go above High-Low except for insane overtime stuff.

The 0.000001% of Sinners can maybe do a single thing against average angels, and their weapons punch above their weight class sufficient to kill veritable gods to Sinners. So yes, durability works. Alternatively...
d6df0374af58.gif
 
Well Emily is clearly not above Adam in power, he is built different you can cry all you want.
Aren't you the one who crashes out?
Oh yes I forgot that Adam has an army, you are SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO smart actualyl WOWWWWW wow!!!! WOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW

And YOU'RE NOT using an episode that's ENTIRE PLOT LINE is that Angels are HARD TO KILL. Yet by your logic all they have is.... oh yeah... NOTHING. Wow, I guess Vaggie just has the ability to heal only for her wings, sure! Wow!!!!!!! Guys Angels have EXTREMELY HIGH durability, remember when they uhhh.... uhh yeah.... they
Vox literally obliterates and accidentally kills sinners in his second fight with Alastor.(first on-screen) So yeah, compared to rando sinners, they're basically invulnerable.
GUYS ANGELS ARE SO DURABLE CANNIBALS CAN DIG THEIR TEETH INTO THEM WITH NO PROBLEM, CANNIBALS HAVE TOP TIER AP FOR HELL?


Ah, so I should make it so they aren't god-tiers and have no defensive hax either, then?

...They're using Angelic Weapons, Shion. A corpse is naturally gonna be less resistant to harm.
 
Aren't you the one who crashes out?
I remember your crashouts, Reaper
Vox literally obliterates and accidentally kills sinners in his second fight with Alastor.(first on-screen) So yeah, compared to rando sinners, they're basically invulnerable
Yet Overlords were pissing their pants and hiding for what reason again?
.Ah, so I should make it so they aren't god-tiers and have no defensive hax either, then?
Funny how your first defence mechanism is always "oh should I downplay the entire series rather than accept I am wrong?"
...They're using Angelic Weapons,
On their teeth? Where the f did you get that from? what are we doing
Shion. A corpse is naturally gonna be less resistant to harm.
Proof? Give me a single reason their durability would be FARRRR weaker that what used to be INVULNERABLE TO HARM can be pierced easily with teeth, it aint even a rotten corpse dude its fresh.
 
Are you like NOT READING MY COMMENTS?

Vaggie had an ENTIRE arc only then she could heal herself, so clearly exorcist angels can only heal when they do that sorta stuff. they are likely heavenborn for crying outloud ofc they have a shittier immortality

In Hell hellborns that are weaker can't even heal, sinners can and higher powered beings can and faster.

In Heaven heavenborns that are weaker can only heal with enough motivation, winners (who also died) can ???? and higher powered beings can heal and faster

fill in the gap
So nobody but Vaggi can even do it then, so no one gets to have it in their pages because if it needs all that setup and hasn't been used by them. Then no other angel would have that, ENTIRELY because Vaggi is an outlier who did it on accident. Even if they do have it in them, that doesn't change the fact that no one else uses it. Not Em or Lute, and Adam damn well could just be powering through the pain. We can't give something that doesn't affect anything.

Vaggi is also fallen which genuinely might be the difference maker, it might actually be a demonic/dark power thing to be able to quickly heal. IK thats just speculation, but if the only angel who did it was a fallen one, and no other non-fallen angels do it, then its not out of the question. Lucifer also wasn't knocked out for very long if the last episode implied anything. So only 2 angels, both fallen, are the only people with angelic power shown to do it. Charlie does probably have it too, but not as fast as you say, considering the blood on her head only disappeared for good after the battle.
 
I remember your crashouts, Reaper
I get annoyed, you ragequit the wiki for half a year cause your GOAT didn't get questionable SI that goes against how the rest of the verse is treated. We are not the same.
Yet Overlords were pissing their pants and hiding for what reason again?
Basically none cause Carmilla casually executed one.
Funny how your first defence mechanism is always "oh should I downplay the entire series rather than accept I am wrong?"
The other option is High 6-B William Afton. I think I'll keep "downplaying", thanks.

I'm giving you tier 5 Hazbin mate. Take it or leave it, you didn't even get around to sending me that Adam thing I asked you to do so I wrote it myself like two weeks later.
On their teeth? Where the f did you get that from? what are we doing
Rewatch the scene, what are they holding? An angelic sword.
Proof? Give me a single reason their durability would be FARRRR weaker that what used to be INVULNERABLE TO HARM can be pierced easily with teeth, it aint even a rotten corpse dude its fresh.
There's no brace for impact, nothing defending themselves, everything's still. This is basic death biology.
 
yeah exactly, it randomly appearing for a SINGULAR shot is an animation error compared to the rest of the shots. so she healed it.
Just rewatched it, the times the blood is there is equal to the times its not, on top of the fact that most of the time her hair is in the way, so since its even, it makes more sense to assume that the blood being gone is the error, not the blood still being there
 
I get annoyed, you ragequit the wiki for half a year cause your GOAT didn't get questionable SI that goes against how the rest of the verse is treated. We are not the same.

The other option is High 6-B William Afton. I think I'll keep "downplaying", thanks.
Yap yap yap, I left scaling on the wiki because I was getting too angry. Now I am rethinking if I did the right thing only messing with discussion threads when its pissing me off just as much
Take it or leave it, you didn't even get around to sending me that Adam thing I asked you to do so I wrote it myself like two weeks later.
You mean his AP thing? I did make a blog, is this not it? Tfym you mean you wrote it I am confused.
Rewatch the scene, what are they holding? An angelic sword.
While biting into the skin with their teeth, thats not angelic.
There's no brace for impact, nothing defending themselves, everything's still. This is basic death biology.
They are death sure but their skin isn't suddenly MUCH weaker, you are saying they are INVULNERABLE to Sinner attacks yet somehow they get so weak after death that sinners can rip into them with teeth? Normal teeth?
Just rewatched it, the times the blood is there is equal to the times its not
Pretty sure this is blatant lie, I rewatched it AGAIN it only appears once after she initially heals it. Do show me these amount of times.
 
Yap yap yap, I left scaling on the wiki because I was getting too angry. Now I am rethinking if I did the right thing only messing with discussion threads when its pissing me off just as much
Watch some Bob Ross or something.
You mean his AP thing? I did make a blog, is this not it? Tfym you mean you wrote it I am confused.
I didn't ask for a rework with what YOU wanted. I asked for something like this:
  1. At most 5-B+/Low 5-B+: Adam makes an off-guard Lucifer grunt with a tackle, can temporarily throw him away in snake or octopus form, tanks a casual horse kick, gets a nosebleed from a casual off-guard punch(though it had him screaming in agony), and is able to get up after a Bloodlusted Lucifer beats his ass and was one hit from ending his life.
  2. Attack Potency does not scale, but durability does: In this instance, Adam would be a stomp level above Full Power Alastor's strongest attacks, and we(bullshittily, I should add) say that Adam being casual means his durability was just in the range for FP Alastor to be able to damage.
  3. Adam does not scale at all to Lucifer: Take what I said for scaling to Alastor, remove the durability fuckery, and there you go.
I copy/pasted this from my actual on-forum sandbox for the CRT. And I pre-emptively put you in first option for voting.
While biting into the skin with their teeth, thats not angelic.
After they were already dead.
They are death sure but their skin isn't suddenly MUCH weaker, you are saying they are INVULNERABLE to Sinner attacks yet somehow they get so weak after death that sinners can rip into them with teeth? Normal teeth?
We can eat Sharks and bears, can't we?
Pretty sure this is blatant lie, I rewatched it AGAIN it only appears once after she initially heals it. Do show me these amount of times.
I think it did only appear the once, but that's like... Low regen lmfao
 
While biting into the skin with their teeth, thats not angelic.

They are death sure but their skin isn't suddenly MUCH weaker, you are saying they are INVULNERABLE to Sinner attacks yet somehow they get so weak after death that sinners can rip into them with teeth? Normal teeth?
It probably only applies when they are alive, like its a passive that relies on living. Which is a reasonable enough assumption
Pretty sure this is blatant lie, I rewatched it AGAIN it only appears once after she initially heals it. Do show me these amount of times.
No, that would take so much effort for something I don't have to prove, it was 4 - 4, with the rest being obscured by her hair, its not hard to stop d!ck riding and count for your self. I have better things to do in abt 20 mins then argue against a guy who everone here knows is wrong
 
We can eat Sharks and bears, can't we?
Wall level or not, flesh is made to be soft, bone and stone are rigid, its fair to assume that durable but soft things are susceptible to piercing and tearing, especially since they aren't alive for their supposed healing factor to kick in anyway. I could totally bite off a chunk of shark, it would be unpleasant but I could.
I think it did only appear the once, but that's like... Low regen lmfao
I counted about 4 times on each side, literally 50/50 if she healed (she didn't until far after combat applicability)
 
its not hard to stop d!ck riding and count for your self.
I watched it dude, there wasnt 4 scenes with blood I am watching it a third time, it appears ONCE after the initial heal. I also have never seen you make a single great point yet, what was the last thing anyone agreed with you?
I didn't ask for a rework with what YOU wanted. I asked for something like this:
  1. At most 5-B+/Low 5-B+: Adam makes an off-guard Lucifer grunt with a tackle, can temporarily throw him away in snake or octopus form, tanks a casual horse kick, gets a nosebleed from a casual off-guard punch(though it had him screaming in agony), and is able to get up after a Bloodlusted Lucifer beats his ass and was one hit from ending his life.
  2. Attack Potency does not scale, but durability does: In this instance, Adam would be a stomp level above Full Power Alastor's strongest attacks, and we(bullshittily, I should add) say that Adam being casual means his durability was just in the range for FP Alastor to be able to damage.
  3. Adam does not scale at all to Lucifer: Take what I said for scaling to Alastor, remove the durability fuckery, and there you go.
I copy/pasted this from my actual on-forum sandbox for the CRT. And I pre-emptively put you in first option for voting.
Why the **** would 3 even be an opiton tbh but whatever, I still didnt understand what you want maybe its a language barrier
We can eat Sharks and bears, can't we?
We can bite into sharks and bears even when they are alive... they are also not invulnerable
 
I watched it dude, there wasnt 4 scenes with blood. I also have never seen you make a single great point yet, what was the last thing anyone agreed with you?
Right now with Reaper and basically everyone else, and reaper agreeing that AL is comparable to Adam to an extent, and quite a few others actually, and sides, at least im trying to be better and not flail around
 
Why the **** would 3 even be an opiton tbh but whatever
it's basically the "disagree" section,
I still didnt understand what you want maybe its a language barrier
Maybe, but what's done is done.
We can bite into sharks and bears even when they are alive... they are also not invulnerable
No we genuinely can't. Unless it's a really ******' small one on either side.
 
No we genuinely can't. Unless it's a really ******' small one on either side.
I dont have proof but I am almost certain I could bite into a shark or a bear, obviously not get through bones but definitely pierce into their flesh and rip some out. Would GPT know?
 
I dont have proof but I am almost certain I could bite into a shark or a bear, obviously not get through bones but definitely pierce into their flesh and rip some out. Would GPT know?
For Sharks they're all muscle IIRC. Try ripping a piece out of your forearm... metaphorically speaking, don't actually hurt yourself.

And bears are even worse. Thick ass fur and even more muscle and strong skin.
 
So its telling me I can barely get into its flesh but not rip it apart, you are correct

But it also told me that it wouldn’t change anything if they freshly died, so I am correct too

Edit: From my knowledge, Rigor Mortis could make it even HARDER to bite into them after death lol.

Meaning my point about how they would pierce through the exorcist stands
 
I DID IT! I ACCOUNTED FOR EVERY SCENE CHANGE WHERE WE COULD SEE THE ANGLE AND GUESS WHAT! I was a little off, most of the time the hair WAS in the way, but blood appeared 9 TIMES WHILE THE NO BLOOD WAS ONLY 7 AT MOST AND IM...a little dubious on if I should have counted one of them.
You would not believe how finicky the screenshoting process was, I had to use my phone lol.
I did it!
 
Long story short, the blood disappearing was most definitely the error, not the opposite
I DID IT! I ACCOUNTED FOR EVERY SCENE CHANGE WHERE WE COULD SEE THE ANGLE AND GUESS WHAT! I was a little off, most of the time the hair WAS in the way, but blood appeared 9 TIMES WHILE THE NO BLOOD WAS ONLY 7 AT MOST AND IM...a little dubious on if I should have counted one of them.
You would not believe how finicky the screenshoting process was, I had to use my phone lol.
I did it!
 
Back
Top