- 14,391
- 5,220
Yeah, as I said, poison is the one thing Connie can't defend against.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Versus someone who's battle experience is better. The bottom line is, even if Connie is absolutely flawless and can keep up with someone who's more experienced than her, how does she close the gap? How does she deal with bombs, flash bangs, and toxic gas? At the very, very worse, CH can simply tire her out, since Connie doesn't actually have the stamina to keep up with him. CH can run for hours in a desert so hot that animals would fall to heat stroke. He can hold his breath for over 24 minutes. He can run miles upon miles without even building lactic acid. Connie simply can not compete with that.Paulo.junior.969 said:Yeah, I care about what is shown too, but I'm not in charge here, so what can I do? But yeah, Connie has to play perfectly, dodge everything and not make a single mistake... which is exactly what she is going to do, because her battle experience is just that good.
If we're going by years, millions of years of all the greatest warriors of all time, those who were stars, miracles among humanity, able to fight no matter what came to them... Far surpasses a few thousand.Paulo.junior.969 said:I don't think just being a bunch of veterans is enough to compare to the skill of those who can defeat three battalions of the best warriors in the universe casually.
Oh yeah, that too, Gems canonically have been fighting for much longer than humanity has even existed. Like, for real, when they arrived at Earth, humans were still primitives, and they had been conquering wolrds for eons by that point.CinnabarManx421 said:Humans haven't been around for millions of years.
Collectively, across the life spans of each and every one of them?CinnabarManx421 said:Humans haven't been around for millions of years.
I don't like using lore "muh years" experience either. Nobody is 'in charge' of SU matches; a bad argument is a bad argument. If you don't like it, then debate it, like I am right now.Paulo.junior.969 said:None of which really compare to SU's bullshit lore only battle experience, since the longest war the OC has been in only lasted 335 years.
Honestly, I never liked using that lore only experience the SU characters have, but it has always been used as an argument for SU characters, as in, literally every SU thread uses that, including the ones that were added, so what can I do? If you don't agree with that, go complain to whoever is in charge of the SU matches, that's really not with me.
You can debate it.Paulo.junior.969 said:Honestly, I've never been a fan of this bullshit lore only skill we give to the SU character, but it is accepted in pretty much every SU match, so what can I do?
Arguments aren't officially mandated like that. Ant doesn't stand behind a desk with a folder of allowed arguments, look at Steven Universe skill, and go "Well that's a fact, people! No challenging this!"Paulo.junior.969 said:If you don't like an argument this wiki uses, go complain to someone who is part of the wiki, not with someone who has nothing to do with anything like me.
You can well, debate things. Change is allowed to happen.Paulo.junior.969 said:If you don't like an argument this wiki uses, go complain to someone who is part of the wiki, not with someone who has nothing to do with anything like me.
Removal threads exist. I mean, you're basically admitting you don't believe in Steven Universe skill, but only going with it because that's what other people say. And I don't really know how to respond to that.Paulo.junior.969 said:I don't think it does matter, but if this wiki does (which it does, since SU matches that use that as arguments have been added), then I just follow it, my opinion doesn't matter, because if it did, I wouldn't be debating on this wiki, I would go somewhere else, it's pretty simple actually.
Nah, not really, most revisions are only accepted if they are done by well known members, and even then it starts a thread with 100+ replies that I don't have the patience to read, and I really don't care enough about it to do so; regardless, my opinion really doesn't matter, it never did, I'm just here to waste my time saying "FRA" in random thread about cartoon characters and OCs instead of doing something useful with my life, so it's easier if I just let things happen.Wokistan said:You can well, debate things. Change is allowed to happen.
No arguments for Connie closing the gap have been presented, though. Until someone provides a way a lesser skilled opponent can close a gap that large, there's no argument for Connie.CinnabarManx421 said:Honestly yeah gonna vote Connie FRA.
Exactly, that's what I do.ThePixelKirby said:You're basically admitting you don't believe in Steven Universe skill, but only going with it because that's what other people say.
Who's the other? Since Cinnibar hasn't really presented his own argument for how Connie gets close to CH, and you admitted you don't even believe in Connie's skill, which even at how you present it, is lower than CH's.Paulo.junior.969 said:Anyway, right now I think that's 3 for the OC and 2 for Connie.
But you don't believe in your own argument, and even then your argument doesn't account for CH's better skill.Paulo.junior.969 said:He FRAed my argument, which is that Connie scales in skill from characters who have been fighting for eons by the time humanity was still getting started.