- 783
- 132
What I was saying was just basically my thought process about the whole thing, but I'm trying to back it up with evidence of her affecting a world and not just a country, and there's more than enough for it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You don't threaten me, Davy. If you get the admins in, they'll look at this thread, see your stubborn hypocrisy and straw-grasping, and then conclude that I was right and possibly issue you a ban. I'm not the one indulging in semantics and unfounded assumptions here; you are. That you think I'm calling fallacy with "no evidence" shows you not only refused to acknowledge anything I said, but that you think everyone here will just accept your points at face value without any sort of scrutiny. That is not how it works around here, and you will not get that to change.Davy0 said:So we should deny the fact that a book has its own universe just because you think that the world is smaller, even though they constantly say "the world and this kingdom". Right?
You're correct. When you prove me wrong, I'll give it to you. But you haven't done anything but call "fallacy" with no evidence. For everything actually, due to overly cautious BS, but that's on you. I do know that if you close this thread again over the same BS because you don't believe it, I'm gonna be royally pissed and get admins to escalate this further. But your BS ends with that, though.
Read my post above to see why "the world" does not automatically mean planet.Davy0 said:Ah so... "World Destruction" has no meaning when relating to a scene in which the entire world would have been destroyed. No. They constantly stated that THE WORLD was going to be destroyed. That the world was in peril, and they even stated "The world and the kingdom". Once again, your ammunition lacks.
I could care less about what you think about it Uncle. Unfounded Assumptions? More than what you;ve shown. "Semantics", possibly, I love a good roast after all. Refuse to acknowledge? I've acknowledged plenty of times when I'm wrong, multiple times. I'm not stubborn enough not to understand my faults. Threaten you? You act like I just said I was gonna kick your ass, but sure. Whatever. Have your internet hissy fit, it's something you can take home with you while not having any evidence to support why it isn't factual.Unclechairman said:You don't threaten me, Davy. If you get the admins in, they'll look at this thread, see your stubborn hypocrisy and straw-grasping, and then conclude that I was right and possibly issue you a ban. I'm not the one indulging in semantics and unfounded assumptions here; you are. That you think I'm calling fallacy with "no evidence" shows you not only refused to acknowledge anything I said, but that you think everyone here will just accept your points at face value without any sort of scrutiny. That is not how it works around here, and you will not get that to change.Davy0 said:So we should deny the fact that a book has its own universe just because you think that the world is smaller, even though they constantly say "the world and this kingdom". Right?
You're correct. When you prove me wrong, I'll give it to you. But you haven't done anything but call "fallacy" with no evidence. For everything actually, due to overly cautious BS, but that's on you. I do know that if you close this thread again over the same BS because you don't believe it, I'm gonna be royally pissed and get admins to escalate this further. But your BS ends with that, though.
Also, you can stop bringing up all the "work" you did to gather your talking points. Not only does how much effort it took you to get it not correlate with it's truthfulness or accuracy, but you act like it was back-breaking work. It was not. Virtually everything you've presented here can be found right on the Sonic News Network, and anything that isn't on there can be found on YouTube. You're not fooling anyone.
Speaking of closing the thread, I'm quite close to doing so. You're indulging in the same behavior that caused me to close the last thread, and I'm getting tired of having everything I say ignored or twisted around. You've just been plugging your ears and going "lalalalala, not listening" as I'm sitting here trying to explain myself, and I see no use in talking to someone who won't listen. In fact, I'd probably get more accomplished from talking to a brick wall.