• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Fullmetal Alchemist Revision - Part 2, Scaling First Half (8-C Characters Physical Stats Revision)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nothing really, there was a counterargument, which I countered, and I'm gonna bump a bit more for a reply, then close the thread if there isn't one.
 
Okay. The revisions should preferably be applied before you close the thread though.
 
also also also there is one minor thing I forgot, characters should be "At least Transonic", not just Transonic, as Edward pulls off the Transonic feat in the very first chapter and he explicitly grows in speed a lot throughout the series.
 
also also also there is one minor thing I forgot, characters should be "At least Transonic", not just Transonic, as Edward pulls off the Transonic feat in the very first chapter and he explicitly grows in speed a lot throughout the series.
If this is one of the changes you're talking about I still agree to with it
 
The day I do tiershit is the day I die
 
It's an inside joke, "tiershit" being Low 2-C and above. Typically I don't enjoy messing with that kind of thing because I can't calculate stuff for it and I don't like double checking its standards to make sure my interpretation is correct.
 
Anyway, can I consider this approved?
 
From what I recall, we approved this earlier.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top