• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Examples of Marvel Inconsistency

Messages
8,901
Reaction score
2,219
Since Matt and Ant decided to end the conversation... I wanted to continue it, but put a spin on things to an extent. I would like to name a few inconsistencies Marvel-wise, to prove on why the revision is so hard to make:

- Eternity's portrayal in Ultimates is likely the strongest version we have here. Everything known and unknown [ Which would likely include the Crossroads of Infinity as Kevin Brashear directly references that Infinite-DImensional construct ] is only a small part of Eternity's vastness . Yet, Lifebringer Galactus is literally stated to be equal to him.

- Cosmic Cubes being stated to be Omnipotent. According to the creator of the Guidebook, when he put an synonym to "Omnipotence" in the guidebook , he meant infinite-Dimensional.... I mean that potentially could explain why Shaper of Worlds is in EVERY Multi-Abstract comparison you can think of... But wow . That would literally mean any live cosmic cube is High 1-B ... Kobik vs The Glory incoming [lol ] ! That would mean... Kubik is High 1-B... The fricking heck ?!

- In-Betweener being stated [ as a whole, doesn't say either Universal or Multiversal, meaning "as a whole" ] in a guidebook to be completely unaffected by the Infinity Gauntlet. Uhmm... Bruh.

- The Universal Abstracts having a At least 2-A feat [ Residing in Overspace, which was commented by Ant-Man, a mortal that goes to the place often, so his word should be taken at face value ] to be above and beyond all known realities. I am not talking the " Multiversal " variations, just the much weaker variations. It was stated many times to be the "domain of the Universal Abstracts" , so it isn't like Eternity in Eternity's realm fiasco we dealt with formerly .

- Franklin harming a High 1-B variation of Eternity and Infinity fusion [ Boundless Multiverse, which was approved by Schroeder to be a High 1-B showing ] . While he's consistently Multi-Eternity Level [ At least ] , he's never actually harmed the High 1-B variation of him though. And this... wasn't just Eternity, but Infinity fused with Eternity.

- The Infinity Gauntlet nearly destroying the Dimension of Manifestation, which is a 13-D Construct. Now, it was stated it encompasses the whole multiverse, and there was evidence back then the multiverse was High 1-B. Now imagine the IG being High 1-B because of it... Inconsistency.
 
Can you please just leave Marvel alone? I do not have the time and energy to keep dealing with it over and over.
 
Okay, although the biggest inconsistencies tend to be the comparative matchup results, which seldom have any logic to them whatsoever.
 
I am almost positive you're exaggerating what the description of the Cosmic Cube is implying.
 
Nope . I saw in a scan that an author of the guidebooks state that whenever he put "Omnipotent" , he meant Infinite-Dimensional. I wouldn't joke/exaggerate like that.
 
Can you show that scan? However, the guidebook authors are generally low-ranking Marvel staffers. Their opinions are very far from law.
 
Doesn't black panther still have the reality stone, after secret wars? Could be added to his profile?
 
I do not think so.
 
I think that all of them have to be used together to efficiently use the reality stone.
 
It's on Google+ . But, i think i saved it somewhere. I'll have to look for it.

Actually... It's worse. Yes, it was a question and answer thing... But yeah... Instead of it being "Omnipotent", it was "Infinite Power" . That makes the statement... a lot more ignorant.
 
Well, that reply does not really amount to anything.
 
Perhaps we should close this?
 
Back
Top