- 3,346
- 1,902
How much energy would it take to evaporate the part of the Arctic ice caps? the portion evaporated would be 1.82 million square kilometers. and what tier would this be?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
theres no calc for ice evaporation, just meltingcalc it
Use Water evaporationtheres no calc for ice evaporation, just melting
you can.theres no calc for ice evaporation, just melting
so smartyou can.
find energy needed to bring ice from (whatever temperature it's at) up to 0C [i.e melting point], then get energy to change state from solid to liquid, then energy to bring that water from 0 to 100C [i.e boiling point], then energy to change state from liquid to gas.
specific heat capacity and latent heats of fusion and vaporization.
Alright thanks, how do i factor timeframe? the event in question happens in a single video frameyou can.
find energy needed to bring ice from (whatever temperature it's at) up to 0C [i.e melting point], then get energy to change state from solid to liquid, then energy to bring that water from 0 to 100C [i.e boiling point], then energy to change state from liquid to gas.
specific heat capacity and latent heats of fusion and vaporization.
could you show me the video?Alright thanks, how do i factor timeframe? the event in question happens in a single video frame
its not a video, but text from a LN, heres the textcould you show me the video?
Another fragment fell on Russian land, raising an alert for an attack from another nation,
which left the whole world in a tense state.
But it was the second large fragment that caused the biggest worldwide impact.
The fragment flew north preserving all of its tremendous magical energy, making the impact
of its fall to physically obliterate its surroundings.
It didn’t cause visible geographical changes, but its mental shock on humanity was large.
As the observation satellites suddenly showed that
12% of the Arctic ice caps vanished from one footage clip to the next.
Had this happened to Antarctica’s ice, it would have had a tangible effect on Earth’s oceanic levels.
"one clip to the next" implies different videos where something happened between. there's no mention of frames.its not a video, but text from a LN, heres the text
satelites record continuous video"one clip to the next" implies different videos where something happened between. there's no mention of frames.
apparently, they do not.satelites record continuous video
That would apply to a normal satelite that surveys the whole earth. There are satellites stationed above the polar ice caps so they can observe them.
's fine. still doesn't address the fact it's explicitly called a clip. frames aren't mentioned anywhere, and assuming "by clip they meant frame even though clip means separate videos and that's the word in the actual passage" is a leap in logic.That would apply to a normal satelite that surveys the whole earth. There are satellites stationed above the polar ice caps so they can observe them.
Satellites have provided a reliable tool for continuously monitoring changes in the Arctic ice since 1979. Every summer, the Arctic ice cap melts to what scientists call its "minimum" before colder weather begins to make ice cover increase.
I think it would be fine to assume that while it is a separate clip, it picks up from where the last one ended's fine. still doesn't address the fact it's explicitly called a clip. frames aren't mentioned anywhere, and assuming "by clip they meant frame even though clip means separate videos and that's the word in the actual passage" is a leap in logic.
the problem is the timeframe is unknown, the text just says "suddenly, 12% of the arctic ice is gone"I think it would be fine to assume that while it is a separate clip, it picks up from where the last one ended
I think you're allowed to assume a reasonable timeframe since one isn't giventhe problem is the timeframe is unknown, the text just says "suddenly, 12% of the arctic ice is gone"
can you confirm this?snip