- 86
- 24
- Thread starter
- #41
Ok
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have some problems with the 2-A justification and A LOT of problems with Low 1-C and Immeasurable speed. P&A seems fine, more or less.StrymULTRA said:Found this versio in OBW, is it fine?
It was, for lack of better words, mathematically BS.HyperSsonic said:Hey why was dimensional tiering given the axe?
Did it specifically say he'd destroy them all in one-shot? And being able to move to other timelines isn't an Immeasurable feat at all, you could do that with MFTL+ and good enough range. Same with the Anti-Void stuff, that doesn't even qualify for Infinite anymore.StrymULTRA said:2-A rating is because it's explained a LOT of times that he'll destroy all the AUs, that are confirmed to be a 2-A cosmology from the scans there.
Immensurable speed is because still in the 2-A reasoning one of the scans says that Ink!sans exists outside time and space and can reach immediately any timeline, and Ink is his par in stats
>Immensurable speed is because still in the 2-A reasoning one of the scans says that Ink!sans exists outside time and space and can reach immediately any timeline, and Error is his par in statsStrymULTRA said:2-A rating is because it's explained a LOT of times that he'll destroy all the AUs, that are confirmed to be a 2-A cosmology from the scans there.
Immensurable speed is because still in the 2-A reasoning one of the scans says that Ink!sans exists outside time and space and can reach immediately any timeline, and Error is his par in stats
We'd still consider it a 2-B to 2-A feat since the feat takes precedent over the author's intent. You could argue that it's an outlier unless he was amped or something but this is still a valid feat.RinneItachi said:Although, if we go off of Underverse, Error does have a solid feat of casually destroy the multiverse in one move, but I don't think Jael intended for it to be multiversal+, based on the actual scene.
When I mentioned the author intent, I also meant to imply it's an outlier. Error has never performed an on screen feat of even remotely similar power in the entirety of Underverse, and is only stated to have destroyed universes occasionally in other cases, even then, we don't know how the process is done. Iirc, it's actually implied that he affects the universes code, corrupting it, and basically deletes it, possibly overtime, but doesn't destroy it with his actual, normal AP. It's also possible that Jael wasn't counting what would be considered universes as actually universes in the sense of a feat, since Error destroyed papers representing universes (26:47). I do know that feats like this are usually still considered legit, and that the feat still takes precedence over Jael's intent, I just wanted to mention it. Oh, and as for how impressive the feat would be in the tiering system, I'd guess 2-B. To clarify, each "Alternate Universe" actually counts as a multiverse, aside from AU's taking place in alternate timelines of the original universe, Undertale, which simply count as alternate timelines within the Undertale multiverse. Every unique AU separate from Undertale has it's own AU's, thousands of them according to Ink Sans (25:30). Since there are currently 350 documented AU's, this would mean at least a 6 digit number of universes that Error destroyed. Again though, this feat can easily be considered an outlier.Planck69 said:We'd still consider it a 2-B to 2-A feat since the feat takes precedent over the author's intent. You could argue that it's an outlier unless he was amped or something but this is still a valid feat.
I never heard that. I know CrayonQueen is the same person as Lover of Piggies. And in what I'm seeing, there's even the comic for Error's origin, on the same page as Error Vs. Underswap, and everything else I've mentioned. So I'm pretty sure it's canon. Regardless, even if that's the case, I don't retract my point. Trying to make sense of everything for each relevant AU character, to an extent where we can make accurate profiles and the like for them, let alone Error, would be between extremely hard, to impossible.YuriAkuto said:Aren't comics not on Crayonqueen blog non-canon to the character?