You accuse me of creating a strawman, despite the strawman on your side.
It's very common sense for Vs debating; destructive capacity =/= Attack Potency. We can't just give Earthbound "Shabby Treatment," just because we don't see much destruction. Look at the ratings of other JRPGs; Final Fantasy VII for instance. Everyone in FFVII is
4-B based on Sephiroth's supernova calc despite it not destroying the Earth. So using that as an excuse for Earthbound is a massive double standard. And as mentioned above, Sanctuary Guardian fights actually take place in subconscious minds where nearly anything is possible. There's also plenty of other games like Chrono Trigger, Rain of Destruction busts the planet's surface in one blow, but when fought as a boss, there's no collateral damage and fight takes place in a temple; further proving the lack of destruction as a double standard.
That next paragraph is also very hypocritical as well as quantity over quality. On this site, Quality > Quantity; using appeal to popularity is all quantity and no quality. Anyway, I know some of those people well, but Arbitrary is the only one who gave elaborate details, but even those were argued against and hasn't brought up a concrete counter argument afterwards. Also, don't accuse me of being unfair, I actually know some of these people well and have full respect for them. Also, it's even more unfair to argue against only half my points and not the others; which I'll explain in the next couple of paragraphs.
First of all, I already brought up that
8-B is a baseline for tornado feats, and that
8-A is a baseline for "Nuke everything" statements. Furthermore, comparing Nuclear Robots to "Football sized explosives" such as the
W54 warhead. The Davy Crockett is only the size of a football and wields 10 to 20 Tons of TNT; so that proves anything lower than
8-B is a borderline knit pick. Second, the W-54 is like 9 feet long and is narrow in width; and it yields a 250 Ton of TNT. The Nuclear Robots and Atomic Robots are about the same height as Starmen, who are roughly twice the size of a human; and are nearly as thick as they are tall. So just from eyeball analysis, the nuclear robots should be bigger than those; case closed.
Now as mentioned above, Cruise Ships have at least
High 8-C durability via sheer size, but completely shattering one is an
8-A to
Low 7-C feat. Look at the size comparison between the Kraken and the ship; it's wayyyyy bigger than the ship, so there's no reason for the Kraken not to at least be capable of completely smashing the ship. Furthermore, you blatantly avoided my next point that on this image below...

You can see the Kraken slightly dwarf the size of the volcano. I know sprite scaling is inconsistent, but the sea travel scene was inherently expressing the travel from country to country; meaning those islands and volcanoes in this instance are intended to be real volcanoes; rather than pixel scaling gap, A > B > C size comparisons makes more sense. Additionally, read Chrisras's next point; he literally said that the official Japanese guidebook describes Thunder and Storm as effecting the planet's weather. There was also something about the Large Palm Leaf he mentioned. Which means he at the very least, they are capable of producing standard traditional storm feats that justify the
Low 7-B rating. Which even that's a lowball if anything.
So in conclusion, they aren't based on "Assumptions", there are actually scientific facts and common sense on my side. It's also extremely unfair to just discredit mine, Chrisras, DaBigP, and Iapitus's points just because we happen to be "outnumbered"; elaborated details are just as vital scans. It's also narrow minded to say, "No evidence" when there could be some you haven't looked at. I agree that scans are important, but it's unfair to be inconsiderate my RL situation and health. And it also doesn't discredit my other points where I actually did give scans, or where the threads I linked contained scans. We can't just create a new double standard just to downplay Earthbound while nearly every other JRPG, as well as other verses such as Star Wars gets their justifications and even Discussion Rules arguing against downgrading those.
I'll dig for possible back up scans for the Foreside statement or Hiroshima nukes, ect
when I have time or energy, but
other points remain. Address,
every single point and
every single detail of those points, don't just say argue against one or two points or one or two details of other points and say "I gave no evidence." Also, if upper comments are edited, the new information brought up in the edited versions are also important.