Yeah, that's the
literal translation of the term, but it being the direct and literal word-for-word, bar-for-bar translation doesn't necessarily mean it's the
correct translation; the latter of which is what the blog is claiming. What I am saying is that nothing in the blog has actually deduced that it
has to mean order of magnitude here (and by result, justifying the claim that's presented). Without that justification, there's effectively nothing that actually proves the databook said that instead of what the official translation said (or other translations).
The last part matters because the burden of proof is on yall to actually justify it being a 10x amp. This doesn't prove that.
Honestly the statement does seem extremely hyperbolic regardless given how it's presented. But let's say it isn't, right? Just because it's the most used context for that word, and thus the primary definition, that doesn't mean that it's usage proves the meaning here, the context does. And right now, all I'm seeing is context that doesn't necessarily prove this.
Like, I would've granted an amp like this if it said directly that it was 10x, or a statement in the manga corroborating that with similar stuff, as that removes the ambiguity. Hell, I would've granted it if it said 10x horsepower or something but that's not the case here. Since the ambiguity still remains, there's not a solid enough basis to be had here, I'm sorry.
Keta Chigai, with it's other translations, is quantitative in itself and not exclusively qualitative. That's my whole point really; there's nothing that justifies it being a qualitative amp except for assumptions with little to no basis. And I don't actually wanna bother with arguing how Naruto/Bleach's context in their stories grants it that; hencewhy I said that
if they used this same line of reasoning
, it should be axed for them too.
A mere kanji with several different meanings that are all equally valid (one of which was already said to be so in the blog, once again) doesn't actually prove a claim here.
Translation staff confirming a translation =/= it's the irrefutable correct one. Tons of statements translated by the translation team have been refuted so this doesn't actually mean much. Same thing goes with FinePoint agreeing with it, their agreements doesn't actually prove what I wanted you to prove here.
It can be a stomp amp given that context, that's fine and was never something that was refuted by me personally. However, that being the case doesn't mean it's a 10x one. The translation saying something like "A slayer's combat ability becomes out of one's league" (paraphrasing) is an equally valid translation that would grant it being a stomp amp, but not a 10x one. The number requires more evidence than this.
It isn't, I checked. The consistency section doesn't actually prove it
has to be an order of magnitude of a stat difference and the caveat section has a pretty flawed reasoning, which I'll explain below to avoid repetition.
She could've used alot of terms to express a power amp, that's correct indeed. But just because she used this one specifically, that doesn't necessarily mean that Keta Chigai
must mean 10x. A multiplier requires far more concrete evidence than this, the multiplier standards themselves dictate that.
Tanjiro hyperbolically claiming a 100x amp on a form he didn't even know existed doesn't necessarily add credence to Gotouge "meaning" to use the term to quantify the amp; that's still an
assumption/conclusion from very incomplete information and doesn't actually fly here.
In fact, if yall are arguing that to be authorial intent, that fails because the number that is used in the databook and manga do not line up at all. Unless you guys would be arguing for a 100x multiplier using Keta Chigai; which would then fall under so many inverse problems and inconsistencies with the multiplier standards that it would get axed instantly; this is just a lite version of that scenario.
-
To me, this line of logic just seems like just a number to fall back on because it's a lowball and the kanji
maybe would support it, which isn't a strong enough of a stance in my opinion. But hey, I'm just a blue name. Let's have staff weigh in on this.